We’ve got 3 days, and we need LESS THAN $25,000

Ok, these annoying posts will end, hopefully before my readership disappears. But we are extremely close. We’ve got three days left, and are within $25,000 of meeting our goal.

There have been lots of great questions about the goal, about what happens if we miss it, and about why we need money anyway (“aren’t the licenses already written?”). We should have done better explaining all this upfront. My fault for not seeing that more clearly. But from the better-late-than-never department, here is a bit to address some of these questions.

(1) Where’d you get the goal of $225,000?

To understand this, you need to know something about the “public support test” that is part of the IRS review all tax-exempt non-profits suffer after 4 years of life. That test essentially asks, how diverse is your funding support. If most of your support comes from a few foundations, then there’s a risk you’ll lose your tax exempt status. I let this issue remain unresolved for too long. But this is the year the numbers will be calculated, and hence the push right now.

When we saw how much we needed to raise to pass the test, we divided up areas of support. The $225,000 is the amount we absolutely must raise from a general public appeal. If we meet that, and the other goals we’ve also set, then we’re fine.

(2) What happens if we fail this test?

The risk is that we’ll lose our public charity status. That’s critical to us because some foundations are not able to support organizations without a public charity status. And however fantastic the support from the public has been so far, we still absolutely must continue to get foundation support.

(3) What do you need the money for anyway?

This is the core question I should have done lots more to address much earlier in this process. For its clear many people think CC’s just a bunch of servers serving licenses. Indeed, that’s precisely what CC will always be — we’ve built a contingency plan to assure our licenses are served for a “limited time” (in the sense that copyright terms are for “limited times”). But right now, we’re much more than a bunch of servers.

As I explained in the final post to the Lessig Letters, CC has a staff of about 20 people world wide. (I’m technically on the staff as its CEO, but I’m unpaid). Those twenty work in four separate offices. Our Berlin office manages the process of porting licenses internationally. Our London office is building the international community of the iCommons project. Boston runs the Science Commons project. And San Francisco does all the rest. That staff is underpaid (relative to their contemporaries at least), but even at bargain basement wages, it is not cheap to keep the lights on. One fourth of the staff is technical; three are lawyers. All are working extraordinarily hard to spread and build CC.

We’re proud of the fact that a very high percentage of our funds goes directly to “programs and services.” (82% in 2004, with 18% spent on administration, and 8% on fundraising. See our audited statements for 2004 posted here. But that’s 82% of a large number. We expect that to accomplish all we’ve promised in 2006, our budget will be close to $2m.

What have we promised? Well, in addition to growing license adoption, and spreading the tools to integrate CC into critical content creating apps, I’ve signaled four key projects for the year. Two we’ve been quite public about: (1) the cc-commercial project, and (2) the free content license interoperability project. And then there are two more secret projects that I’ve described here. This is the work we have left to do. This is the work that needs your support.

So three more days if this pestering. Or one, if we can get $25,000 in the door by tomorrow.

Support CC here.

This entry was posted in creative commons. Bookmark the permalink.

63 Responses to We’ve got 3 days, and we need LESS THAN $25,000

  1. anonymous says:

    Thank you for the explanation, it helps a lot. Maybe you could link to it from the “support” page:

    http://creativecommons.org/support/

    because right now there’s no way to tell from that page what, exactly, we are supporting.

  2. James Day says:

    The WikiPD project sounds interesting as a concept but I’m concerned about “procedures for establishing levels of confidence in the accuracy of that data, for example, before it was added to the wiki”, which is the wrong way around to be doing things – the wiki should be where anyone can be gathering information and conributing to the research, otherwise it’s locking out most of the interested community from participation. Worth collecting information about authors with no work in the public domain also, since their work may eventually enter the public domain and information is more likely to be available on them while they are actively producing new works. Hopefully the wiki and data would be public domain and also licensed with all possible licenses, since the apparent objective is maximising information availability.

    Returning Authors Rights is also interesting but is very ironic, since the recent revisions to the Creative Commons licenses allow attribution and the ability to trace the author to be stripped from works and taken by a message board, wiki or other hosting site, having exactly the opposite effect. It used to be safe to assume that a CC license would protect the author but it’s no longer the case, unfortunately. Still, so far as it goes, this project is a very good idea. Just wish the other actions weren’t undermining the principle and encouraging destroying the record (correct attribution) needed to prove that the author is the person claiming to be the author.

  3. Thanks for explanation, I just donated.

  4. orcmid says:

    I’ve donated again because I do want you to be able to satisfy the IRS, yet I find myself strangely-conflicted by this request and the urgent need for humanitarian relief around the world. I suppose what I will do is match my contributions to CC with the same amount to the Red Cross International Relief efforts.

    What concerns me is that I feel a little hijacked by what seems to be mission creep. You picked the budget and are expanding the scope of your activities, and now I have a more complex demand-pull decision to make. I think you may need to provide for targeting of contributions in the future and get some sense of what matters to your commoner supporters.

    The experience is not unlike, at my end, the problem I have with the local NPR station. I have supported them and now I receive these awful monthly mails pretending to be program guides that are simply repetitive appeals for funds (with the amount filled in). I have been put off by that enough that I give every other donation opportunity priority, which is stupid of me, but it is the only way I actually have to vote. (I actually prefer the American Red Cross international activities because they are the least intrusive, along with Care International, in terms of follow-on fundraising.)

    So, here we have a fundamental question about participation, engagement, and focus of activities. Please don’t turn into yet-another fund-raising machine.

  5. Happily contributed… and linked to the contribution page from my blog. My blog, my flickr photos all use the CC license. It’s my pleasure to give back.

  6. John says:

    Just wish the other actions weren’t undermining the principle and encouraging destroying the record (correct attribution) needed to prove that the author is the person claiming to be the author.

  7. Tony says:

    I gave what I could. Good luck!

  8. of course like your web site however you have to take a look at the spelling on
    quite a few of your posts. A number of them are rife with spelling
    problems and I to find it very troublesome to inform the truth nevertheless I’ll certainly come again again.

  9. cxc says:

    تدریس خصوصی دروس کنکور ریاضی و تجربی

    تدریس خصوصی دروس مهندسی برق و مکانیک و عمران

    تدریس خصوصی دروس فیزیک و شیمی و ریاضی و عربی دبیرستان

    تدریس خصوصی تمامی دروس دبیرستان و دانشگاه و کنکور

    تدریس خصوصی دروس دبیرستان

    رشته ریاضی و فیزیک

    تدریس خصوصی تحلیل سازه

    تدریس خصوصی فولاد و بتن

    تدریس خصوصی مکانیک سیالات

    تدریس خصوصی هیدرولیک

    تدریس خصوصی مکانیک خاک

    تدریس خصوصی پی سازی

    تدریس خصوصی ریاضی 1 و 2 دانشگاه

    تدریس خصوصی فیزیک 1 و 2 دانشگاه

    تدریس خصوصی ریاضی مهندسی

    تدریس خصوصی معادلات دیفرانسیل

    تدریس خصوصی محاسبات عددیتدریس خصوصی آمار و احتمالات مهندسی

    تدریس خصوصی استاتیک

    تدریس خصوصی مقاومت مصالح

    تدریس خصوصی دینامیک

    تدریس خصوصی ترمودینامیک

    تدریس خصوصی مکانیک سیالات

    تدریس خصوصی طراحی اجزا

    تدریس خصوصی ارتعاشات

    تدریس خصوصی دینامیک ماشین

    تدریس خصوصی انتقال حرارت

    تدریس خصوصی تجزیه و تحلیل سیگنال ها و

    سیستم ها

    تدریس خصوصی الکترومغناطیس

    تدریس خصوصی الکترونیک 1 و 2   

    تدریس خصوصی مدار های الکتریکی 1 و 2

    تدریس خصوصی میکروپروسسور

    تدریس خصوصی مخابرات 1 و 2

    تدریس خصوصی مدار منطقی

    تدریس خصوصی ماشین الکتریکی 1 و 2

    تدریس خصوصی بررسی سیستم های قدرت

    تدریس خصوصی سیستم های کنترل خطی

    تدریس خصوصی ریاضیات گسسته

    تدریس خصوصی حساب دیفرانسیل و انتگرال

    تدریس خصوصی جبر و احتمال

    تدریس خصوصی هندسه تحلیلی

    تدریس خصوصی حسابان

    تدریس خصوصی هندسه تحلیلی

    تدریس خصوصی شیمی دبیرستان

    تدریس خصوصی ریاضی 1 دبیرستان

    تدریس خصوصی عربی دبیرستان

    تدریس خصوصی زبان انگلیسی دبیرستان

    تدریس خصوصی آمار دبیرستان

    تدریس خصوصی فیزیک 1 دبیرستان

    تدریس خصوصی ریاضی 2 دبیرستان

    تدریس خصوصی ریاضی 3 رشته علوم تجربی

    تدریس خصوصی ریاضی پیش دانشگاهی تجربی

    تدریس خصوصی فیزیک 2 دبیرستان

    تدریس خصوصی فیزیک 3 ریاضی-فیزیک

    تدریس خصوصی فیزیک علوم تجربی

    تدریس

    خصوصی فیزیک پیش دانشگاهی ریاضی

    تدریس خصوصی فیزیک پیش دانشگاهی تجربی

  10. hi its realy good thancks . good job

  11. milad noruzi says:

    نماشویی
    superlative & top , thank you

  12. milad noruzi says:

    thank you , it`s perfect

    چاپ بنر

  13. Kafsab1 says:

    Thank you for being there by my side every time I was confused

    کفسابی

  14. Kafsab1 says:

    You may have limited resources, but you do have an unlimited appetite for giving.

    تین کلاینت

  15. copyrangi says:

    thank you for this informative article

    درب بطری

  16. copyrangi says:

    Thank you So Much For Sharing Contents

    آیلتس

  17. copyrangi says:

    That is actually a tremendous web site.
    آیلتس

  18. Cysec Corporate says:

    Good article , you can find some similar topics in my blog as well

    خرید آنتی ویروس

    آنتی ویروس تحت شبکه

  19. farhad hast says:

    لوازم آشپزخانه خود را از کجا بخرید؟
    https://novinjahaz.com/

  20. omidi says:

    امروزه میتواندرب اتوماتیک تبریز را بهترین برند این عرصه در شمالغرب کشور دانست کرکره برقی تبریز از جمله انواع دربهای اتوماتیک پرطرفدار در ایران می باشد درب شیشه ای اتوماتیک در تبریز را میتوان در برندهای متفاوت مانند اریکسن ، رکورد سوئیس ، تورمکس ، لابل ایتالیا ، هالوکس آلمان و…. جستجو نمود کرکره برقی در تبریز پیشینه ای قدیمی دارد جک بازویی در تبریز نیز مانند سایر درب های اتوماتیک دارای انواع مختلفی مانند بی اف تی ، پروتکو ، فادینی ، فک ایتالیا ، راجر و…. درب سکشنال تبریز تعمیر کرکره برقی تبریز دوربین مداربسته تبریز گیت سه اهرمی در تبریز گیت فروشگاهی در تبریز دزدگیر لباس در تبریز قفل کمد استخری در تبریز

  21. برای مطالعه بیشتر کسب و کار اینترنتی به وبسایت ما سر بزنید
    https://eqva.net/

  22. pc app store says:

    nice post, thanks for sharing it

    Traktor Pro 3 Crack

  23. webenno says:

    that`s obviously a lot money …
    عسل طبیعی خود را در ظروف با درب عایق به رطوبت و هوا نگهداری کنید به این سبب که از آب و رطوبت خواص عسل طبیعیمحافظت بهینه می شود. اگر آب عسل تبخیر شود و آب از عسل خارج شود، عسل به سرعت فرم بلوری و کریستاله به خود می گیرد. اگر آب وارد عسل خالص شود، ممکن است شاهد موارد تخمیری در عسل خالص باشید که اگر مقدار آب موجود در آن تقریبا کمتر از 17٪ باشد، دیگر چنین مسائلی رخ نمیدهد. برای نگهداری طولانی مدت عسل ماکان خود اطمینان حاصل کنید که آن را در ظروف با درب محکم و کیپ شده نگهداری می کنید. خرید عسل طبیعیهمواره با توجه به قیمت عسل طبیعیانجام می شود.
    بهترین روش نگهداری و تشخیص عسل طبیعیدر کابینت و قفسه، استفاده از ظروف عسل شیشه ایهستند. بعضی از ظروف پلاستیکی اجازه می دهند تا عسل مقداری از رطوبتش از دست برود و یا اینکه مواد شیمیایی را با عسل مخلوط شوند. برای بهترین ذخیره سازی در پلاستیک استفاده از پلاستیک هایی از جنس HDPE (همانندعسل پت ) استفاده کنید. ظروف استیل ضد زنگ نیز برای ذخیره سازی حجم زیاد و برای زمان طولانی تایید شده اند. از تمام ظروف فلزی یا استیل که ضد زنگ نیستند اجتناب کنید زیرا ماده زنگ (فلز اکسید شده) عسل شما را آلوده و یا حتی سمی می کند.

  24. pc app store says:

    nice post, thanks for sharing this post

    http://avastcrack.info/

  25. This is the core question I should have done lots more to address much earlier in this process.

    قیمت ورق هایگلاس
    ابعاد ورق ام دی اف 16 میل
    قیمت ملامینه

  26. hey thank you for post please help me in email Well, in addition to growing license adoption, and spreading the tools to integrate CC into critical content creating apps, I’ve signaled four key projects for the year.

    سنگ گرانیت مروارید

    سنگ های ساختمانی

    نمای سنگ تراورتن

  27. h-kasiri says:

    hi how to get LESS THAN $25,000 in 3 day’s thank you.

    فیروزه

  28. h-kasiri says:

    See our audited statements for 2004 posted here thank you.

    ماشین آلات صنعتی

Leave a Reply