Comments on: an environment for software https://archives.lessig.org/?p=2039 2002-2015 Sat, 07 Feb 2015 00:07:00 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.7.2 By: raha azad https://archives.lessig.org/?p=2039#comment-393 Sat, 07 Feb 2015 00:07:00 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2002/10/an_environment_for_software.html#comment-393 Hello dear and my friend

Hello, very nice, thanks admin of this website. Thank.

بانک ایمیل

تور استانبول

ارسال ایمیل تبلیغاتی

تبلیغات در وایبر

متره لیزری

زیباترین آهنگ های بی کلام

مشاوره ازدواج

bye.xxx

]]>
By: paul https://archives.lessig.org/?p=2039#comment-392 Tue, 22 Oct 2002 08:34:04 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2002/10/an_environment_for_software.html#comment-392 Andreesen a proponent of lock-in?

Any links to pages that buttress that argument? I have been amused at the hoohah over “web services” as a new thing when the notion of OS irrelevance/everything runs in a browser was what Netscape was all about. If being able to run applications that anyone can write in a browsser architecture that runs on every platform (Netscape supported just about every OS extant while MSFT focused on their and Mac OS) means I’m locked in, I’ll take it.

]]>
By: Seth Finkelstein https://archives.lessig.org/?p=2039#comment-391 Mon, 21 Oct 2002 10:07:04 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2002/10/an_environment_for_software.html#comment-391 I’ve got to concur somewhat. Ask
Phillip Hallam-Baker about Marc A.
and “lock-in”. One of the complexities
of the Microsoft anti-trust issues, is
that MS trying to kill Netscape, did
not mean Netscape was an angel.

]]>
By: Dave Winer https://archives.lessig.org/?p=2039#comment-390 Sat, 19 Oct 2002 01:55:59 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2002/10/an_environment_for_software.html#comment-390 Oy. Andreessen himself was one of the biggest forces for lock-in, and betting on him one of the biggest mistakes the Valley ever made. If he had been a visionary we wouldn’t be under Microsoft’s thumb now. This has been one of MS’s strongest and most valid defenses.

]]>