-
Archives
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- November 2002
- October 2002
- September 2002
- August 2002
-
Meta
Monthly Archives: December 2002
Broadband wars I
The battle to build and keep broadband neutral is an important issue to me. I go a couple rounds on the FT.COM site about it here. Maybe it is just me, but these debates are never satisfying. The thrust of Tom Hazlett’s final response is that cable is much better than DSL, so don’t regulate cable. On cable, see the next post. But even ignoring the logic of the claim, we should not forget: However good cable is, does it begin to match the broadband options available elsewhere. Again, here in Japan: 100 mbs for $50 a month; 12 mbs for about half that. What cable company comes even close to that? Continue reading
Posted in ideas
Comments Off on Broadband wars I
marriott takes to the air
As many are reporting, Marriott now promises Wi-Fi. No word on price. But I’ve got a word for the idea: Magic. seesupra. Continue reading
Posted in heroes
Comments Off on marriott takes to the air
CC for software?
Matt Croydon wonders about how CC licenses will interact with software. In a careless earlier version of this, I said they won’t. Sam Ruby suggests the most I could mean by that is that our energy will be directed elsewhere. Indeed, that’s the most I mean. We share RMS’s concern that there is a proliferation of licenses in software. And our view was that there was a dearth for other creative content. Thus we start outside the software world. But creative reuse of creative content is what CC is all about. My apologies for any confusion. Continue reading
Posted in creative commons
20 Comments
Final 1976 Act Numbers
After some questions by readers, and suggestions by friends, Jason Schultz has produced his final report about the effect of invalidating the 1976 Copyright Act’s extension of copyrights. Bottom line: more support for the public domain. Continue reading
Posted in eldred.cc
3 Comments
the anticommons strikes again
Jabber has written a powerful piece about the threat that AOL’s patent covering IM technology creates for innovation in the IM market. Even if AOL does not enforce the patent, as Jabber argues, the threat that it may makes is much less likely that innovators will invest time to develop IM technology. AOL’s sword will be enough to keep innovation away, Jabber says.
These issues are complex, but this case does lots to highlight just what wrong about the software patent business. Does anyone really believe that there was inadequate incentives to be inventing in this area? Was there really a need for a government monopoly to help spur innovation? And even if there is, does a 20 year monopoly over something as fundamental as IM make sense to anyone?
Vardi and his son were brilliant inventors. They deserve all the credit in the world. And it is exactly the wrong (since self-defeating) response to now attack AOL: They are a business; the managers are hired to make money; they will make money however they can given the rules as they are.
The appropriate response is to attack the system. It is four years since a court held that software and business methods were patentable. What exactly have we done since then to get legislators to fix this mess? Continue reading
Posted in bad law
Leave a comment
CC Launches
So just back to Japan after a quick trip to San Francisco to help many many extraordinary people launch Creative Commons. The event was fantastic, especially the Flash that explains our Licensing Project. Watch the flash, and check out the site. We are eager for feedback, and for ideas about where to go next.
I can’t begin to describe how grateful I am to everyone who made this happen. I am especially grateful to creators who have run with the licenses right away�heroes such as Cory Doctorow (who will be releasing under a CC license the entire text of his amazing book, Down and Out in the Magic Kingdom as a free, freely redistributable e-book on January 9th. But buy the book as a present. It is the best novel I’ve read in years), and Peter Wayner (who has licensed his Free for All under a CC license), and Tim O’Reilly (the first adopter of the “Founders’ Copyright”).
It is no accident that those who understand this are those closest to technology. Our challenge will be to find ways to explain it so other creators get it as well. If you have ideas, or ideas for new projects, please let us know. Our single, overarching aim: build the public domain, by building projects that expand the range of creative work available for others to build upon.
Meanwhile, thanks to everyone who helped make this happen. And check on this channel for more news as the project develops. Continue reading
Posted in creative commons
2 Comments
cc launch
After many hours with lawyers, and many productive hours with tech-types, and lots of imagination by many, an idea first suggested by Hal Abelson and Eric Eldred will come to life on Monday, December 16: Creative Commons. Come see (though RSVP because we’re filling fast) and celebrate. ‘Tis the season to be giving, and this will be a great gift to the Commons. Continue reading
Posted in creative commons
1 Comment
War that helps — consumers
So the price war for broadband continues here in Japan. This snippet, shot from Jiro Kokuryo’s phone, tells it all. NTT now offers 12 mbs for about $20/month. And 100 mbs (fiber) for $46/month. According to LowerMyBills.com, I can get 1.5 mbs for $50/month in San Francisco. Where is war when you need it? Continue reading
Posted in japan
6 Comments
Proud to be a … (what is Stanford’s mascot anyway?)
Stanford’s recent stand in favor of knowledge is wonderful. The criticism needs to be matched by strong support. I, for one, a recent transplant to paradise, am proud of my University. Continue reading
Posted in heroes
13 Comments
Fiscal challenges
I received an email from Eben Moglen today. Eben’s been donating his time and legal talent to the Free Software Foundation for a very long time. (He, unlike some of us, is a real coder as well as legaloid, and he’s about the most impressive and passionate speaker I’ve ever seen).
Eben’s missive was a request for money for the Free Software Foundation. He has put his money where his missive is. Though he has given many times this amount in his own time, he wrote a check this month to FSF for $20,000.
At about the same time I heard about that, I receive a notice from the treasurer of the Eldred Legal Defense Fund (which does not need money at the moment), that we had received an extremely large contribution from “someone in Japan.” I tracked it down, and discovered that the incredibly talented Mr. Yamagata, who has translated tons of great stuff, and also has translated my books, has a policy of giving “50% of the money [he] earns from translation to free-software related projects.”
And on the very same day I learned about this gift from Yamagata, I learned of the work of Luke Francl to take a bit from my OSCON speech and try to do some good with it.
If there’s one thing I’ve learned from watching, and tinkering, in this web-log space, it is that the many tiny brushstrokes of thousands paints more and more powerfully than the blast of even the most important and powerful papers. (This is especially true here in Japan, as innovators such as Joi have tried to show.)
But just as these words are important to reason, so too is the support of right-acting organizations important to getting good done. Social entrepreneur Henri Poole (another strong FSF supporter) has built a powerful tool to translate reputation into support. (See the description here.) But whether you use his tools or not, it is at this time of the year when donations are crucial.
As I indicate on my Affero page, I count FSF and EFF as the two key players to support. But whether these two, or two others, do something now. If not as much as Eben, or as principled as Hiroo, then at least enough to show that reason has support. Continue reading
Posted in heroes
2 Comments