-
Archives
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- November 2002
- October 2002
- September 2002
- August 2002
-
Meta
11 Responses to Netroots Nation Keynote
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
It’s obviously clear how you stand on the influence of money in politics, but do you think it would be a bad idea if there were a website to “democratize” lobbying? In other words, people could go online and not just contribute money to officials that support certain issues, but also pledge further contributions if a representative supports upcoming issues one way or another. Such a system would be bipartisan, and would have to make sure that each of its users is a registered voter. The system could then track issues moving through Congress. Users would, of course, be provided with a way to contact their representatives; however, many who are tired of just receiving auto-responses might be interested in pledging money and seeing what kind of response they get then.
I was just thinking about this kind of system when you mentioned “targeted donations,” although the system I described above is probably not what you meant.
I’m usually not the person to really think about these things. Its kind of pathetic how I never thought of all the many ways in which our government is corrupt. However, recently I have been thinking of what are the motivations behind reports, stories articles and such. I have realized that the transfer of money is deffidently an issue. As well as if the company who reports news, I believe this is called being public rather than private, is bought out by other parent companies whom do not want to be reflected badly in reports of this news outlet. I used to read cnn, NYtimes and others but now I’m looking through the blog o’ sphere for answers, and indie news outlets. This video was amazing and really made me think more about the ins and outs of the way the government functions. I’m a 14 kid who at this time has a summer job and I would just like to say that I’m joining Change Congress and ActBlue and I will most deffidently be contributing part of my salary to the cause of reform in our government and they way politics are meant to be conducted. It’s like Al Gore said, the change will not arise from simply believing, but will arise from our behaviour in how we save democracy.
Wow, Max, you’ve made my year! Thank you. (And I trust you don’t mind the delete.)
@Justin, cool idea. Yes, we should be democratizing lobbying. And I like the idea of contingent incentives. But a similar idea was raised at a blogger meeting after this keynote, and someone worried it would be a kind of bribe.
While I don’t doubt that the Clintons, Obama, and virtually all politicians have been influenced at the margins by campaign contributions, this narrative is not supported by Hillary Clinton and the bankruptcy bills. If anything, Hillary Clinton screwed the credit card industry after taking their money by voting for two meaningless, failed bills and did not vote for the final bill that became law.
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/08/08/clinton-and-the-bankruptcy-law/
2Justin, cool idea. +1
you are genius)
volume is way low on this file.
and I agree with the other posters who would have preferred to read the entire text of the declaration, rather than having it in the center of the page imitating a pamphlet…..
Just FYI, the Citizen pledge on the change-congress.org site is incredibly buggy… It won’t generate the html for the badge in either FF or IE, and IE it won’t even apply the stars correctly for the four parts of the pledge.
Also, instead of a text message update system, is @change_congress on twitter a member of the project? Hard to tell from the bio.
Hello, Max, “one dollar one vote” is not my idea of democratization.
Online “Money talks” advocacy would automate the current positive feedback process which has aggravated economic inequality over the last few decades.
Concentrated wealth has been buying political access and influence, and helps elect politicians whose broad policies favor the rich in general, even without direct bribery. Some examples are: shifts of tax burdens from the rich to the middle class and working poor, deregulation of telecom mergers and financial speculation , pro-corporate trade agreements like NAFTA, and multi-billion dollar subsidies to corporations like Exxon-Mobil which are already making record profits.
Concentrated wealth already dominates the private sector. Democratizing government requires freeing public officials from dependence on private money, by full public finanacing of campaigns, and guaranteeing candidates equal access to broadcast media.
But at least you are thinking about opening up the political process to public participation, which is not bad for a “14 kid”!
Have you given any thought to people outside of the States who would like to join the Change Congress? The Bush administraton has done much to frustrate, anger, and exasperate those living in other countries. Yet, at the core, as you say, the problem does not lie in who is holding the presidential office, but the intrinsic falibility of a system corrupted by money. It would be marvelous if globally, we could make some constructive direct comment to your politicians showing them that we do care how they vote on policies, such as environmental issues.
Do you remember one of our rights- freedom of speech? Certainly you can pick and choose what comments you want to add to your blog, however, they don’t show the true picture. Sad, that’s what the division between parties does. That’s why your pursuit to “fix” Congress will fail. We all need to work together – us Troglodite conservatives and Pure and Perfect Liberals, to accomplish this goal.