Comments on: Some important news from Wikipedia to understand clearly https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3466 2002-2015 Wed, 08 May 2013 03:11:21 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.7.2 By: outletfzynragklsoj https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3466#comment-22936 Wed, 08 May 2013 03:11:21 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2007/12/some_important_news_from_wikip.html#comment-22936 michael kors handbags

]]> By: outletylfgkduallor https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3466#comment-22935 Sun, 05 May 2013 21:38:50 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2007/12/some_important_news_from_wikip.html#comment-22935 louis vitton online

]]> By: David Tames https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3466#comment-22934 Sun, 14 Sep 2008 06:57:41 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2007/12/some_important_news_from_wikip.html#comment-22934 Could someone provide an update of the current state of affairs? I have a very practical question: when and how will a wiki that is published under the terms CC-Attribution-Share-Alike be able to incorporate Wikipedia content which is GFDL licensed? Right now, even if I properly attribute, it’s a violation of the license terms, which is frustrating. This news to move towards compatible licenses is great, but when will the new compatible GFDL be published? What is holding things up?

]]> By: joann https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3466#comment-22933 Wed, 02 Jan 2008 11:16:56 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2007/12/some_important_news_from_wikip.html#comment-22933 This video, there has been important progress in making Wikipedia compatible with the world of Creative Commons licensed work. But we should be very precise about this extremely good news

]]> By: EVula https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3466#comment-22932 Fri, 14 Dec 2007 09:41:26 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2007/12/some_important_news_from_wikip.html#comment-22932 I suppose I’m a bad en.wp admin for not really understanding why I should care about this. 🙂

]]> By: crimeny https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3466#comment-22931 Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:22:06 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2007/12/some_important_news_from_wikip.html#comment-22931 Could someone please explain all this in plain English? What is the change with Wikipedia? Is this good or bad? Why? Thank you.

]]> By: Tor Hershman https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3466#comment-22930 Tue, 04 Dec 2007 12:51:40 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2007/12/some_important_news_from_wikip.html#comment-22930 Dear Mr. Lessig,
As you may see from this YouTube film/research (Creative Commons) , progress is relative.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7iQRFP_e90

]]> By: Seth Finkelstein https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3466#comment-22929 Sun, 02 Dec 2007 22:17:31 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2007/12/some_important_news_from_wikip.html#comment-22929 @Fred – I’ve become very cynical over the years. But I’m still uncertain on the particulars here. It’s basically a “corruption” problem – there’s no incentive for a disinterested party to thoroughly analyze a complicated issue, leaving us without adequate information.

]]> By: Evan Prodromou https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3466#comment-22928 Sun, 02 Dec 2007 20:03:38 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2007/12/some_important_news_from_wikip.html#comment-22928 @Seth Finkelstein: one of the great things about Free Culture is that even bad people can use free works — even to do bad things! As an occasionally bad person, I find this aspect of the movement very encouraging.

]]> By: Evan Prodromou https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3466#comment-22927 Sun, 02 Dec 2007 20:01:27 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2007/12/some_important_news_from_wikip.html#comment-22927 Your link to the license is incorrect; because you left out the colon after “http”, the browser renders it as “http://http//creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/”. Adding the colon in should fix it.

Please feel free to delete this comment after correcting the problem.

]]>