WIPO’s latest destructive regulation: The Broadcasting and Webcasting Treaty. Jamie Boyle nails it.
CPTech has an action page. So too does the EFF.
-
Archives
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- November 2002
- October 2002
- September 2002
- August 2002
-
Meta
Does this new law have a name please? I’d like to do some more reading on the topic.
“The Broadcasting and Webcasting Treaty”
I meant the name of this 20 year right it would establish. What’s it called in the countries who have already implemented it? Sorry for being unclear.
Many thanks.
The U.S. Delegation has proposed the name “WIPO Treaty for the Protection of the Rights of Broadcasting, Cablecasting and Webcasting Organizations.”
You can find the latest documents related to the treaty here.
This is a better link for the latest documents: Treaty on the Protection of Broadcasting Organizations.
Be careful, the WIPO’s search tool is case sensitive.
Maybe Professor Lessig should write an essay on the harms of “harmonization” and the way it is used to restrict constitutional rights. “HARMonization” is always wrong because it is always used as an argument why a law that should not be passed, because of the Constitution or morality or even common sense, can be. It was the mechanism used to get the DMCA passed, and then the same argument was used for an EU DMCA. We had to “HARMonize” with Europe, then they had to “HARMonize” with us.
I thought the US revolution was fought precisely so that we US citizens would not have to live by the laws of that insane, self-declared continent. Thanks to “HARMonization”, we now have perpetual, undocumented copyrights which allow lawsuits for such abstract ideas as “derivative works”, which clearly restrict the rights of new authors and, on the Internet, restrict the rights of anyone who wants to “speak”. Do we really need more unfair laws from Europe?
LuYu: interesting, so the blame for all the evil of the world is in Europe, right? How come you got DMCA before us? How come you got software patents (although arguably we have them now, thanks US for a pioneering good practice (NOT))? How come it’s European legal tradition that admits things like private copying without profit motive as legal? Oh well, not that it matters…