Comments on: “You can VIEW the entire letter …” https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3256 2002-2015 Thu, 19 Oct 2006 12:29:03 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.7.2 By: Tom https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3256#comment-14666 Thu, 19 Oct 2006 12:29:03 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2006/10/you_can_view_the_entire_letter.html#comment-14666 xpdf on my Linux machine handles this document properly. That is, it allows me to print it without asking for a password. That’s what any software written to respect its users would do. The problem is not with the document – the problem is that some people are using the wrong software.

]]>
By: John https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3256#comment-14665 Thu, 19 Oct 2006 03:06:47 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2006/10/you_can_view_the_entire_letter.html#comment-14665 If you have a Mac with Preview version 1.0, you can open it in that and print it from there: Preview 1.0 ignores the password protection…

]]>
By: Jeff https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3256#comment-14664 Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:55:33 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2006/10/you_can_view_the_entire_letter.html#comment-14664 pdftk FLOSS-letter-ISC.pdf output FLOSS-letter-ISC-printable.pdf allow printing

]]>
By: Peter Suber https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3256#comment-14663 Tue, 17 Oct 2006 11:57:05 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2006/10/you_can_view_the_entire_letter.html#comment-14663 See Robert Gellman, Government should use DRM sparingly, in the current (October 9) issue of Government Computer News. It seems that many government agencies dislike this as much as we do but aren’t sure what they can do when a citizen submits a copy-protected comment as part of a public hearing. Excerpt from Gellman:

“A similar issue came up years ago when I worked for a House of Representatives subcommittee. Someone submitted testimony for a hearing with a prominent copyright notice. Did that mean that the testimony could not be distributed or printed? No one was quite sure, but we took the easy way out. We ignored the copyright notice. The submitter never objected, preferring to influence and not anger the committee. With a DRM-restricted document, however, subsequent dissemination of that testimony could have been difficult or impossible.”

One more reason to expand and clarify fair use.

]]>
By: rkillings https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3256#comment-14662 Tue, 17 Oct 2006 07:23:37 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2006/10/you_can_view_the_entire_letter.html#comment-14662 Amusing: the creator of this PDF disallowed printing but neglected to enter a document security password. What a pointless gesture.

If a password had been entered, it could still be easily circumvented — thanks to Dmitry Sklyarov! Yes, six years later, the infamous Advanced eBook Processor program *still* cracks Adobe Document Security on PDFs.

]]>
By: Crosbie Fitch https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3256#comment-14661 Tue, 17 Oct 2006 06:22:57 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2006/10/you_can_view_the_entire_letter.html#comment-14661 Somehow, I’m reminded of the Outer Limits:

There is nothing wrong with your television set. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling transmission. If we wish to make it louder, we will bring up the volume. If we wish to make it softer, we will tune it to a whisper. We can reduce the focus to a soft blur, or sharpen it to crystal clarity. We will control the horizontal. We will control the vertical. For the next hour, sit quietly and we will control all that you see and hear.

Perhaps this was subliminal programming designed by a cabal of IP maximalists a few decades ago, and it’s now paying off?

]]>