Comments on: self-answering questions https://archives.lessig.org/?p=2155 2002-2015 Wed, 18 Dec 2019 07:49:00 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.7.2 By: sink luxe https://archives.lessig.org/?p=2155#comment-1130 Wed, 18 Dec 2019 07:49:00 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2003/04/selfanswering_questions.html#comment-1130 جارو برقی پاکشوما

بله پاکشوما جاروبرقی هم داره ایول به این برند باحال
Vacuum cleaner Pakshuma

Yes, Pakshuma Vacuum Cleaner also has this cool brand
Пылесос Пакшума

Да, пылесос Пакшума также имеет этот крутой бренд


جارو برقی پاکشوما

فروشگاه لوکس

]]> By: activex https://archives.lessig.org/?p=2155#comment-1129 Mon, 03 Nov 2003 19:05:56 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2003/04/selfanswering_questions.html#comment-1129 I think both of them

]]> By: Anonymous https://archives.lessig.org/?p=2155#comment-1128 Wed, 23 Apr 2003 21:50:46 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2003/04/selfanswering_questions.html#comment-1128 I think a “google” of posts works…

]]> By: Karl https://archives.lessig.org/?p=2155#comment-1127 Wed, 23 Apr 2003 02:26:07 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2003/04/selfanswering_questions.html#comment-1127 As far as “obliteration through litigation” is concerned, I believe it may be time to revive prosecutions for barratry, especially in the realm of fair use. Until there is a penalty for bringing a nuisance claim against an obvious fair-use, I don’t think the rate of such claims will drop.

Fair use is not a right as long as the cost is endless litigation.

-kd

Collective noun nominations: String, Thread, Nest, Nexus/Node, Hub/Spur…

]]> By: Dave Ethington https://archives.lessig.org/?p=2155#comment-1126 Tue, 22 Apr 2003 16:37:12 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2003/04/selfanswering_questions.html#comment-1126 Sorry, I didn’t mean to shout. My previous post looked fine in the preview…

]]> By: Dave Ethington https://archives.lessig.org/?p=2155#comment-1125 Tue, 22 Apr 2003 16:35:37 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2003/04/selfanswering_questions.html#comment-1125 I have no legal background at all, so maybe this is just hard to understand for that reason. I have two questions about the legal portions of the post:

  • Why didn’t the betamax case resolve the legal issues for ReplayTV before they were bled dry by legal fees? Couldn’t a judge look at the case and say we already have an answer on this one?

    • and…

  • Is there any way to fix the problem of “obliteration through litigation”? It seems enormously unjust that a company (or individual) can be shut down merely because they can’t afford to fight it legally.

As for the collective nouns, my vote is for chain.

]]> By: Code https://archives.lessig.org/?p=2155#comment-1124 Tue, 22 Apr 2003 03:19:12 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2003/04/selfanswering_questions.html#comment-1124 I do believe a large portion of e-mail is a “ream”. Something about being not paper mail…

-Code

]]> By: Lessig https://archives.lessig.org/?p=2155#comment-1123 Sun, 20 Apr 2003 18:26:04 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2003/04/selfanswering_questions.html#comment-1123 Very nice, both of them!

]]> By: Dr Elwyn Jenkins https://archives.lessig.org/?p=2155#comment-1122 Sun, 20 Apr 2003 18:08:21 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2003/04/selfanswering_questions.html#comment-1122 On collective nouns — what about:

A chain of blogs (giving the idea of linking on to the other).

A chorus of posts (as many posts simply add weight to an idea linking and pointing with a little comment).

]]>