Category Archives: bad law

dark news about the archive

Bill Patry has a very depressing account about a “a horrific DMCA et al. suit filed against the Internet Archive.” Continue reading

Posted in bad law | 10 Comments

got a letter from Bruce Lehman

I got an email from Bruce Lehman, which was very big of him after I criticized him for his claim that I “seem[] to believe you can have a post-industrial economy without any copyrights.”
Anyway, Bruce’s email (and to be clear, it was sent not just to me, but to me as a “IIPI Supporter” (which has as much connection to the truth as his statement above)) was proud to announce a new section on the IIPI website called a “Discussion Forum.”
The discussion forum was inspired by the “debate surrounding the European Union�s (EU) proposed Directive on Computer Implemented Inventions (CII).” As Bruce writes, “It is important to remember that the patentability of computer implemented inventions, or lack there of, will have a profound effect on European industry and competitiveness.” Absolutely right, which is why is it so good that the IIPI has opened a discussion forum on their site so people can contribute to the “discussion” about IIPI’s strong support for this software patent initiative.
I encourage all to answer Bruce’s call: You can find the “CII Discussion Forum” here. And be sure to spread the word! Continue reading

Posted in bad law | 64 Comments

PFF: Right (as in correct) they are

The “Progress” and “Freedom” Foundation has called (rightly) for Supreme Court review of the “obviousness” standard in patent law. Continue reading

Posted in bad law | 4 Comments

the "balance" that is WIPO

wipo_dev_agenda_2.gif

More from EFF.
You can also add your name to a petition. Continue reading

Posted in bad law | 16 Comments

the "democracy" that is Europe

So despite the fact that the EU Parliament has rejected software patents for Europe, and despite the fact that there is not a qualified majority of member states supporting it, the EU Council has now endorsed their draft of the “Directive on the Patentability of Computer-Implemented Inventions.”
This struggle continues to astonish me. There’s no good economic evidence that software patents do more good than harm. That’s the reason the US should reconsider its software patent policy.
But why Europe would voluntarily adopt a policy that will only burden its software developers and only benefit US interests is beyond me.
They call it a “democracy” that they’re building in Europe. I don’t see it. Instead, they have created a government of bureaucrats, more easily captured by special interests than anything in the US. Continue reading

Posted in bad law | 33 Comments

the facts on the flag

The LuminousVoid has a report about the arguments in the DC Circuit about the broadcast flag. Continue reading

Posted in bad law | 13 Comments

the parody police making a parody of IP

rcube.jpeg
sb37.jpg

Law enforcement is apparently busy keeping our borders and toystores safe from pirates (read: terrorists). US Customs agents, for example, reportedly seized “clearly piratical copies” of a Stripburger series called “Richie Bush,” a parody of Richie Rich. This followed a report that the Department of Homeland Security sent agents to a toy store to order them to remove a toy called “Magic Cube” from the shelf because it allegedly violated the trademark of Rubik’s Cube. (The patent protecting the cube has expired.) According to the Department’s spokeswomen:

“One of the things that our agency’s responsible for doing is protecting the integrity of the economy and our nation’s financial systems and obviously trademark infringement does have significant economic implications.”

Obviously. Just imagine the spike in GDP produced by the government’s efforts to eliminate competition in children’s toys. And just in time for Christmas no less. Continue reading

Posted in bad law | 33 Comments

Killing Philadelphia freedom

In September, I reported that Philadelphia was considering funding a WiFi service for the city. Sixty percent of the citizens have no access to broadband. The city elders believe that’s no way to enter the 21st century.
But as Public Knowledge now reports, a bill on the Governor’s desk would now make it impossible for Philadelphia to offer such a service, because it “competes” with private businesses offering the same service.
So, let’s see: If I open a private street light company, selling the photons my lights give off, can Philadelphia offer “free” street lights? Or does the fact that Guards To Go offers services in Philadelphia mean we need to disband the Phlly police department?
I am from Pennsylvania. I spent 4 wonderful years in Philadelphia. (Indeed, I was elected Youth Governor in 1979!) If you’re connected to that freedom-loving state, please say something to the Governor. Continue reading

Posted in bad law | 15 Comments

INDUCING gun control legislation

Sorry, for reasons that will be clear, I have to pull this. More, and better, soon. Continue reading

Posted in bad law | 35 Comments

Rumsfeld's oath and the forgotten constitution

Bruce Ackerman has an interesting piece in the American Prospect about the oath Rumsfeld asked the civilians sworn to review the judgments reaching by the Guantanamo Bay commission: “Does each one of you swear that you will faithfully and impartially perform according to your conscience and the rules applicable to the review filed by a military commission all the duties incumbent upon you as a member of the review panel, so help you God?” “God” is central; the Constitution is forgotten. A metaphor for too much these past few years. Continue reading

Posted in bad law | 11 Comments