The great folks at American University have a great video about “fair use” and remix.
-
Archives
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- November 2002
- October 2002
- September 2002
- August 2002
-
Meta
I suppose it is only inevitable that a document about fair use in the digital media age should itself be a video mashup;)
But like many mashups, it has too many disjointed ideas mashed together, ideas that cry out for an explicit connection that is never made.
So, for example, afte rmentioning “code of best practices”, it shows many images that I suppose are meant to be examples that follow these best practices, but that they do is not explicitly stated, nor is it ever stated how these are examples of the best practices.
In fine I cannot therefore agree that this video is ‘great’.
It is indeed ironic that Google is the sponsor of this video. You would think that as a sponsor of this video, Google would recognize the vital importance that Fair Use and the remix culture plays on the internet. Yet, the company makes the practice unnecessarily difficult to implement. Look at article 5.B of YouTube’s TOS.
http://www.youtube.com/t/terms
“You may access User Submissions for your information and personal use solely as intended through the provided functionality of the YouTube Website. You shall not copy or download any User Submission unless you see a “download” or similar link displayed by YouTube on the YouTube Website for that User Submission.”
In other words—you are breaking the Terms of Service and could get your account suspended merely for downloading someone else’s video for the purpose of making Fair Use of it. Downloading other people’s videos is a necessary first step for creating mashups, criticism, and conversation. Fortunately, this clause is widely ignored and many conversations take place through video callout and response. Here is a mirrored copy of my one of my favorites by dprjones:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vV70ILOJONA
Unfortunately, YouTube suspended dprjones’s account because of this video. Nobody knows why his account was suspended, but dprjones used his alternate account to provide evidence that this was indeed the video that got him suspended.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_UGZBACVzb4
dprjones is a VERY highly respected YouTuber. He is a British lawyer who has made fair use of other’s videos in order to expose outright fraud and intellectual chicanery. His suspension brought a ton of outrage by the YouTube community. (Do a YouTube video search on the terms “dprjones suspended” and you will get 7 pages of results). YouTube responded by restoring his account in two days.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQrKZBnGBmQ
Unfortunately, had he not been so popular—had he not had the backing of such a large community, it is doubtful his channel would have been restored.
There are two reasons why I am telling this story:
1) YouTube needs a formal and transparent procedure for people to appeal their suspension when their accounts have been wrongfully terminated (and his is certainly not the only wrongfully terminated account.)
2) Google/YouTube should respect the importance of Fair Use and remix by not making those who obtain the raw ingredients necessary for a remix into TOS violators. Article 5.B of YouTube’s TOS MUST DIE!
I would still have to call it great because Fair Use is not an explicit thing really. even the different possible usages are all implied rather then explicit. but i personally really thought this video was informative and entertaining actually.
yes i totally agree with NeonLightning.. this video was informative and entertaining actually
I think the key word when using copyrighted material for your own creative purposes is, “transformative.” If you’re not creating something new, then you’re likely to be slapped with a lawsuit, or at least a demand for compensation by the copyright holder. My ex-brother-in-law is a record producer, and he’s constantly using bits of copyrighted sound from other artists. He says that in the industry, there’s a rule of thumb that you can’t sample more than about seven seconds worth of sound without having to pay a royalty.
The creators of this video do nothing to communicate the complexity of Fair Use. There have been whole international conferences (CONFU) just on Fair Use to work toward defining Fair US, setting standards, and establishing best practices. And many people who deal with copyright issues on a daily basis would say CONFU failed in helping to resolve these issues. There are volumes and volumes written on Fair Use. There are an endless number of articles (peer-reviewed and popular) that exist – and many would argue there is still no definitive definition of Fair Use. Even if your use of a work does fall under fair use (or you believe it does), there is nothing stopping the copyright holder from going after you anyway!
While this video is informative and does a good job of opening up some of the issues to users, it falls short in describing many of the issues related to Fair Use.