Comments on: lessig blog, moved https://archives.lessig.org/?p=2290 2002-2015 Thu, 31 Jul 2003 01:13:54 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.7.2 By: d https://archives.lessig.org/?p=2290#comment-2880 Thu, 31 Jul 2003 01:13:54 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2003/07/lessig_blog_moved.html#comment-2880 And let me add that Marc Perkel is a notorious fruitbag. For your own sake, please keep offsite backups and be prepared to move servers quickly if his poor technical skills turn out to expose your site to the whims of defacers.

]]>
By: Dan https://archives.lessig.org/?p=2290#comment-2879 Sun, 27 Jul 2003 02:00:37 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2003/07/lessig_blog_moved.html#comment-2879 Regardless of both the good professor’s and Dean’s disclaimers, I think I can be forgiven for still percieving, in a gut way, this to be an endorsement of at least the candidate’s character if not his platform. Which has, admittedly, only worked in his favor; part of the respect I hold for Lessig does then extend to him. But it is, I think, somewhat dishonest to expect us not to emotionally associate this with an endorsement, even if intellectually we know it not to be.

]]>
By: Ugh https://archives.lessig.org/?p=2290#comment-2878 Sat, 26 Jul 2003 18:35:59 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2003/07/lessig_blog_moved.html#comment-2878 volokh.com questions the idea that you hosting Dean somehow violates law and/or FEC regulations, and that if it does, such a law/reg would be unconsitutional, any thoughts? My guess is that it has more to do with the tax-exempt status of LSJU than FEC rules.

]]>