Comments on: Shloss v. Estate of James Joyce: Settlement https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3364 2002-2015 Sat, 14 Feb 2015 07:16:00 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.7.2 By: Alisia Gomez https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3364#comment-15913 Sat, 14 Feb 2015 07:16:00 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2007/03/shloss_v_estate_of_james_joyce.html#comment-15913 Another amazing example of progression, I am pleased to find it. There are so several developers operating on this area but this is one of the best amazing idea ever. Thanks for talking about it here.
assos tatili

]]>
By: seo plugin https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3364#comment-15912 Wed, 01 May 2013 09:29:00 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2007/03/shloss_v_estate_of_james_joyce.html#comment-15912 Hello Web Admin, I noticed that your On-Page SEO is is missing a few factors, for one you do not use all three H tags in your post, also I notice that you are not using bold or italics properly in your SEO optimization. On-Page SEO means more now than ever since the new Google update: Panda. No longer are backlinks and simply pinging or sending out a RSS feed the key to getting Google PageRank or Alexa Rankings, You now NEED On-Page SEO. So what is good On-Page SEO?First your keyword must appear in the title.Then it must appear in the URL.You have to optimize your keyword and make sure that it has a nice keyword density of 3-5% in your article with relevant LSI (Latent Semantic Indexing). Then you should spread all H1,H2,H3 tags in your article.Your Keyword should appear in your first paragraph and in the last sentence of the page. You should have relevant usage of Bold and italics of your keyword.There should be one internal link to a page on your blog and you should have one image with an alt tag that has your keyword….wait there’s even more Now what if i told you there was a simple WordPress plugin that does all the On-Page SEO, and automatically for you? That’s right AUTOMATICALLY, just watch this 4minute video for more information at. Seo Plugin

]]>
By: HTTP://www.brinkjewelry.com https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3364#comment-15911 Mon, 08 Apr 2013 03:37:20 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2007/03/shloss_v_estate_of_james_joyce.html#comment-15911 Attractive component of content. I simply stumbled upon your site and in accession capital to say that I acquire actually enjoyed account your
blog posts. Any way I’ll be subscribing in your augment or even I fulfillment you access constantly rapidly.

]]>
By: Dave https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3364#comment-15910 Wed, 19 Mar 2008 05:47:19 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2007/03/shloss_v_estate_of_james_joyce.html#comment-15910 There is a great streaming video of James Joyce’s “The Boarding House” at the Adam Smith Academy:
http://www.adamsmithacademy.org/The_Boarding_House.html

]]>
By: Dermod Judge https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3364#comment-15909 Mon, 10 Sep 2007 19:58:17 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2007/03/shloss_v_estate_of_james_joyce.html#comment-15909 Some years ago, I tried to get the rights to Joyce’s “Dubliners’ to make a TV series of the short stories, featuring Dublin based actors and each story to be directed by a different Dubliner. My meetings with filmmakers and buyers of TV programming at various maarkets indicated a ready market for such a concept.
Then I aproached the Grandson!
My ears are still ringing from the abuse he poured into them in a phone call from france to South Africa (where I work). My wife wanated to get industrail cleaners in to fumigate the telephone.
Little did I know I was venturing where many more stalwart that I feared to tread.
It’s a great pity that the grandson of the many-times-censored Joyce shpuld himself turn out to be the biggest censor of all.
dermod judge

]]>
By: Chris Newman https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3364#comment-15908 Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:44:45 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2007/03/shloss_v_estate_of_james_joyce.html#comment-15908 Is it clear in the wake of Medimmune that you can destroy declaratory jurisdiction that easily?

]]>
By: Lessig https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3364#comment-15907 Wed, 25 Apr 2007 05:26:58 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2007/03/shloss_v_estate_of_james_joyce.html#comment-15907 The simplest way for a defendant to get rid of a case like this is to file a covenant not to sue. That would remove any threat w/r/t the plaintiff, and then any grounds for federal jurisdiction. This avoids that, while giving the client more than what the case asked for.

]]>
By: Chris Newman https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3364#comment-15906 Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:23:52 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2007/03/shloss_v_estate_of_james_joyce.html#comment-15906 If you were sure you’d win, and the point of the enterprise (in addition to helping Ms. Shloss) is to set clear boundaries of fair use, why settle? We need precedent in this area.

]]>
By: Joe https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3364#comment-15905 Thu, 12 Apr 2007 13:47:23 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2007/03/shloss_v_estate_of_james_joyce.html#comment-15905 That is an important victory for academics. Scholars should have much greater freedom in the usage of literature than they currently do.

]]>
By: Ryan https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3364#comment-15904 Fri, 30 Mar 2007 23:28:02 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2007/03/shloss_v_estate_of_james_joyce.html#comment-15904 Yet another copyright battle won that should have never taken place.

]]>