Author Archives: Tim Wu

Another Alt.Induce.Act

Here’s another alternative to the Induce Act, and there are others out there…. Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

The FCC wants out of copyright

The Broadcast Flag regime is, I think, something of an embarassment for the FCC. Many of the commissioners came to the FCC to deregulate telecommunications law, not to regulate the electronics industry. Yet they find themselves in mission creep mode, issuing command-and-control rules for the design of consumer products, surely prompting some to wonder what exactly they’re fighting for. Evidence that the FCC’s heart isn’t really in this stuff comes from its approval this week of thirteen distribution technologies, without much fuss. It supports the sense that the Commission wants out. Of greatest symbolic importance: Approval of Tivo’s TivoGuard system…. Continue reading

Posted in Telecom | 7 Comments

The Induce Act Revised

Here’s the question: What would the Induce Act look like if it balanced the interests of copyright owners and technological innovators? Here’s what: the Inducing Innovation Act. Comments welcomed, and thanks to all those who helped work on this…. Continue reading

Posted in good law | 5 Comments

BlackWhite

Every so often someone defends, with a straight-face, that which we think undeniably wrong. They say, for example, that the holocaust never happened, or perhaps that slaves actually liked slavery, or that some degree of torture is fine as government policy. Orwell called this ability “Blackwhite,” or “a willingness to say black is white when party discipline demands this.” In its advanced form it leads to “the ability to believe that black is white, and more, to know black is white, and forget that one has ever believed the contrary.”… Continue reading

Posted in ideas | 27 Comments

Copyright in Eight Years

So today copyright scholar Joe Liu at Boston College asked a room full of law professors an interesting question. What did we think copyright would look like in 8 years? Here were some of the main categories of predictions (some contradict):… Continue reading

Posted in good law | 11 Comments

Cameras at Concerts

Last week I went to a Black Eyed Peas concert at the Avalon in Boston. It was a DNC event sponsored by the RIAA, and at the doors, big signs were posted everywhere: “Absolutely No Cameras.” The result: Chaos in the line, as people were sent home after failing cell phone inspection. The choice was to leave your phone / camera behind or leave the concert. People were mad. (“Where is the love?” they asked). So I asked the bouncer, “what’s this about?” And he said “It’s not our deal. Its those guys [the sponsors].” So perhaps this is… Continue reading

Posted in just plain weird | 37 Comments

Wire-tapping VoIP

The FCC today tenatively concluded that most Voice-over IP providers will likely have to comply with a major federal wiretapping statute, the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA). This means companies like Vonage will probably soon have to provide law enforcement with some way to tap their service. I don’t consider the vote particularly surprising — VoIP phones look like telephones, and who’s going to vote against national security? But I nonetheless think the approach unfortunate. Here’s why. VoIP, despite the incessant hype, is still a baby. There has still been more said about VoIP than actually using VoIP…. Continue reading

Posted in NetNeutrality | 8 Comments

We the Media

The full text of Dan Gillmor’s book “We the Media,” about blogs and other things, is now online. (Thanks to fellow alper Cory Doctorow)…. Continue reading

Posted in creative commons | 2 Comments

Reasons

Years ago, when I was a law clerk, I was impressed by how much Judge Posner could accomplish with one simple question. He would ask, “What exactly is the purpose of this law (or proposed rule)?” It was astonishing how often lawyers would stare or gasp, unable to answer this most basic of questions. I think the least you can ask of government, whatever branch, is that it always have an answer to Posner’s question. When acting on behalf of the public, it ought always have a clear reason for what it is doing, that it can articulate without shame,… Continue reading

Posted in ideas | 12 Comments

The DMCA: Not controversial

Last week I was chatting with a friend who now works on the House Ways and Means Committee. Talk turned to the Australia-US Free Trade Agreement, which Congress passed in July and which President Bush ratified yesterday. “That DMCA and copyright term extension stuff,” he said to me, “None of it was really seen as controversial.” “Some people consider it controversial” I said. “I’m sure you’re right, and that’s what I thought” he said, “But we only got letters from the library people.” A pause. “Its become a standard clause, and doesn’t really get much attention. If people care about… Continue reading

Posted in politics | 11 Comments