Comments on: Please give comments on a lessig.org/blog comment policy

By: Air Max 2014

Air Max 2014 — Tue, 17 Jun 2014 08:12:00 +0000

The Dallas Mavericks are a reported suitor for Carmelo Anthony in the Cheap Nike Free Run free agency, and Dirk
Nowitzki addressed the speculation. “If Carmelo would really love to come Cheap Nike Air Max, we’d love to have
him,” Nowitzki said. The Mavericks are projected to have as much as $30 million
in salary cap space this offseason. Nowitzki added he is confident he would have
no problem coexisting with Anthony. “Listen, Nike Air Max 1
think I’ve showed over my 16 years that I can play with anybody,” Nowitzki said.
“The only tough season I think we’ve had is when we had [Antawn] Jamison and
Antoine Walker and Air Max 2014
who are all three kind of the same four-men, but other than that I think I’ve
shown over my career that I can play with anybody. I’ll adjust, whether Nike Blazers For
Sale have to get out of the way or go to the corner more, post up, pass.
I’ll do whatever, really, that needs to be done out there to win or for this
franchise to be a winner.”

By: Junk car removal

Junk car removal — Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:20:08 +0000

When scrapping a car,its very important for us to look at our clients at an ongoing client not one timer, and treat and serve them the best way possible. We are glad that we have kept this attitude for the past couple of years. This is why our customers are returning to us for more business.

By: Musiclv

Musiclv — Sat, 23 Feb 2013 10:09:05 +0000

Great music, good sensations, no bullshit…
http://www.musiclv.com
all your music needs in one place, checks it out!

By: Junk car removal

Junk car removal — Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:04:13 +0000

The cash value of your old car will change if you remove tires and Catalytic Converter. Vechicles without tires are a little difficult to tow therefore the price we pay is a little cheaper then the cars with tires.

By: battery

battery — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 08:03:18 +0000

[…] The court said that copy protection violates private copying rights. (Hm. That last sentence just made me realize the oxymoronic nature of “copyright”, which is really “copynoright”. :P) This contradicts the European Copyright Directive, and the movie studio is likely to appeal. […]

By: battery

battery — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 05:53:04 +0000

It seems that the phone home feature was time limited and it doesn't do that any more. Whether this means that the DOJ has backdoors in all common operating systems or just a way of adding secret scripts to PDF documents is unknown at this time.

By: Scott Ellington

Scott Ellington — Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:13:25 +0000

Rather than simply removing and entire objectionable comment, I suggest that the volunteer be empowered to strike-through or dim the objectionable elements, phrases, sentences, paragraphs...in order to maintain the integrity of the commenter's communication, while transparently identifying its objectionable components.
Any editing process, though significantly more labor-intensive than simple deletion, more clearly identifies the practical parameters of objectionable commentary than anything else. Any TermsOfService guidelines (I think) should evolve from defensibly, evidential citation that simultaneously reveal the standards of the moderator/community.
Whether eminently on-target commentary should be highlighted (by means of the same editing process) is another suggestion I'd like to tender.

By: Miami Dade Personal Injury Lawyer

Miami Dade Personal Injury Lawyer — Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:23:33 +0000

I think it's a good policy. Free speech is threatened when people feel that they cannot comment for fear of being personally attacked for their comments. I also like the fact that you are not so egotistical as to delete comments that are opposed to your viewpoints. This is the essence of freedom:

"I don't agree with a word you say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it." --Voltaire

By: Anon

Anon — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 07:24:01 +0000

You should delete all comments, including those which attack you and your work, which are expressed in a fashion which a civil adult would not use when speaking face-to-face with another adult. Off-topic comments also get launched. That is, being on-topic is necessary but not sufficient for a comment to remain. Being civil is also necessary but not sufficient for a comment to remain.

Larry, there's an adage which applies to hiring, that says: A-quality people hire A-quality people. B-quality people hire C-quality people. So you need to only make A hires, or your business is headed downhill.

In commenting, I've observed that A-quality comments attract A-quality comments. B-quality comments attract C-quality comments.

I'm an *old hand* at the internet discussion forum game, though I don't care to list my name here. Your blog is already headed downhill as far as comments are concerned. If you want to maintain comment quality, you must prune rather ruthlessly. Now, nothing terrible will happen if you don't. Your comment section won't be any good, but then most comment sections aren't, so yours won't stand out. I don't know that you actually want the hassle of maintaining a good comment section, it's certainly harder than maintaining a bad one. But I'm telling you how, if you want to: if you want to maintain an actual GOOD comment section, one that literally *attracts* A-level commenters, you need to prune ruthlessly.

By: Stephen Allison

Stephen Allison — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 05:21:52 +0000

I do believe it is first and foremost your editorial prerogative, but I respect your effort to ground those decisions in some of principle. if nothing else, demonstrating consistency of thought in all aspects of your work certainly seems good for the 'Lessig' brand.

Wishing you the 'sort of place' you've always wanted,
Stephen

p.s. Cameron F. is a flugtunker