openDRM

Sun has made recent announcements about their openDRM project. In my view, they’ve made some commitments that are important for any DRM project. E.g., as I’ve seen it described, it would be implemented to allow individuals to assert “fair use,” and unlock DRM’d content, with a tag to trace misuse. And they’ve described a platform upon which authors keep the freedom to turn the DRM off, and more the content from the secured platform.

These are good things. But some confuse praise for better DRM with praise for DRM. So let me be as clear as possible here (though saying the same thing I’ve always said): We should be building a DRM-free world. We should have laws that encouraged a DRM-free world. We should demonstrate practices that make compelling a DRM-free world. All of that should, I thought, be clear. But just as one can hate the Sonny Bono Act, but think, if there’s a Sonny Bono Act, there should also be a Public Domain Enhancement Act, so too can one hate DRM, but think that if there’s DRM, it should be at least as Sun is saying it should be.

Posted in creative commons | 50 Comments

“So begins the first large scale open source processor project”

OpenSPARC went live today with the RTL design code for the Niagara chip. The code is licensed under the GPLv2.

Posted in good code | 10 Comments

Only on Fox

cavuto-20060224-2.jpg

(Thanks, Peter!)

Posted in bad code | 9 Comments

The spreading meme of IP extremism

Mother Jones has an interesting fun facts about IP list. If there were a brand manager for IP, this would be more evidence of her failures.

Posted in good code | 3 Comments

to Japan

Creative Commons Japan and Japan’s National Institute of Informatics are hosting a symposium Monday, March 27. The CCJP event is in the morning (info); NII’s is in the afternoon (info: JP; EN).

Posted in creative commons | Leave a comment

Orphans

I feel like one. Here’s the text of a letter I’ve sent to Congresswoman Lofgren and Congressman Boucher — the two key leaders on all things good re copyright in Congress — about the Copyright Office’s Orphan Works Report. No one will like me for this letter.

Posted in free culture | 35 Comments

From CC: The First CC Salon

salon-email-header.png

Please join us for the first CC Salon, taking place in San
Francisco on Wednesday, March 8 from 6pm-9pm at Shine (1337 Mission Street).

CC Salon is a casual get-together focused on conversation and community-building
and is open to anyone interested in art, technology, education, and copyright.

Featuring presentations by:
Josh Kinberg (FireAnt)
Eddie Codel (Geek Entertainment TV)
James Wagner Au (Second Life)

And music by:
Minus Kelvin (ccMixter)

We look forward to seeing you there!

Posted in creative commons | 9 Comments

Cultural Environmentalism at 10

The Stanford Center for Internet and Society is hosting a conference, “Cultural Environmentalism at 10,” on March 10/11 to reflect upon the decade since the publication of Jamie Boyle’s fantastic book, Shamans, Software, and Spleens. While the topic of Jamie’s book (IP policy) is something IP scholars had been talking about for ever, Jamie’s book was one of the best to introduce these issues to a community beyond law scholars. (I first heard about the book at lunch a decade ago when Harvard’s provost told me it was “one of the most important law books I had ever read.”). The book, and the articles that followed it, gave birth to what we should call the “cultural environmentalism” movement — the movement to think about IP policy as environmentalists think about pollution policy.

We designed this conference a bit differently from others. I asked a bunch of IP professors to give me their list of the top “young” IP scholars. I tabulated the votes, and asked the top four to write papers. They agreed. Their papers will be commented upon by leading IP scholars. Here’s the list of presenters and commentators.

Here’s the Center’s announcement. If you can make it, be sure to reserve. There are already a large number who have RSVPd, so act soon.

Cultural Environmentalism at 10
March 11-12, 2006
Center for Internet and Society, Stanford Law School
http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/conferences/cultural/

Ten years ago, Duke Law Professor Jamie Boyle suggested that the history of the environmental movement offered powerful theoretical and practical lessons to those who sought to recognize the importance of the public domain, and to expose the harms caused by a relentlessly maximalist program of intellectual property expansion.

On March 11-12, 2006, Stanford Law School’s Center for Internet and Society will host a symposium to explore the development and expansion of the metaphor of “cultural environmentalism” over the course of ten busy years for intellectual property law. We’ve invited four scholars to present original papers on the topic, and a dozen intellectual property experts to comment and expand on their works.

Molly Van Houweling explores voluntary manipulation of intellectual property rights as a tool for cultural environmentalism. Susan Crawford extends Boyle’s analysis to the age of networks. Rebecca Tushnet, looks at the ways in which the law’s impulse to generalize complicates the project of cultural environmentalism, and Madhavi Sunder looks at how the metaphor affects traditional knowledge. Professor Boyle will also offer some remarks, as will Stanford Law School’s Professor Lawrence Lessig.

The event is free, but registration is required. We look forward to seeing you.

Posted in good code | 7 Comments

“a big mistake, but one that Congress can make”

Marybeth Peters, Register of Copyrights, on the latest extension to the copyright term: Watch here.

Posted in good code | 202 Comments

Bill Thompson on NNeutrality

On the BBC’s website. Nicely done, though now we need some non-“market socialists” too.

(Thanks Donat!)

Posted in good code | 54 Comments