Commencement Address to Atlanta's John Marshall Law School

I was asked to post the text to the Commencement Address I gave at Atlanta’s John Marshall Law School on May 19. With some hesitation (as tongue-in-cheek gets lost in writing), and with one important clarification (the corruption alleged was mine!), I post it here. 

I am a professor of law at Harvard. I run the university’s Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics. At that Center for Ethics, we study corruption. Not Rod Blagojevich, or Randy Duke Cunningham corruption — not “criminals violating the law” sort of corruption. Instead, corruption as in improper influence.

Think about a doctor taking money from a drug company, and then sitting on a panel that reviews that company’s drugs: Not illegal; if disclosed, not unethical, but nonetheless, an influence that leads many to wonder whether it is truth, or money, that led the doctor to approve the drugs.

Or think about an academic taking money from a telecom company, and then giving testimony before Congress that just so happens to serve the interest of that telecom. Nothing illegal about taking that money; if disclosed, nothing unethical about taking that money. But  an influence that leads many to wonder whether it was the truth, or money, that led the academic to speak in favor of that company.

Or think about just about every Member of the United States Congress: taking money from the interests they regulate — Wall Street banks, coal companies, insurance companies, big Pharma — and then regulating in a way that makes life great for them, while making life for the rest of us not quite as great. Nothing illegal about taking that money; if disclosed, nothing unethical. But an influence that leads many to wonder whether it is truth or justice that leads Congress to care about them. Or whether it is just the money.

Now I tell you this about me because I want to establish my own expertise about corruption, so that I have the authority to say this:

My being here today, as your graduation speaker, is totally corrupt. There are plenty of brilliant and successful souls who would have loved the honor of addressing this graduating class of lawyers. But I’m here because I begged. And I begged because my nephew is one among you. And the love and pride that I feel for him led me to do something that I have literally never done before — ask to speak some place — and that in turn led your law school to do something no law school has ever done before — granted me an honorary degree and allowed me to speak to a graduating class. This is all deeply corrupt; I am expert and I can prove it: It wasn’t reason that led me here; it was love. And while that’s perhaps a more pedestrian, forgivable, sort of corruption, the question it now begs is whether I can dig myself out of this deep and corrupt hole, to make something useful, maybe even virtuous, from this corruption.

That’s something many of you know something about — deep holes that you need to dig yourself out of. I tried to find the tuition of Atlanta’s John Marshall Law School on its web page but I could only find the cost per credit hour — $1,128 — and because I’m a lawyer, there’s no chance I would know how to multiply $1,128 by the number of credit hours you all need to graduate, but I take it it’s big. And I take it as well that most of you have had to finance that big number with even bigger loans. Which, when they’re paid off with their even bigger interest rates, will be a really really big number. Way beyond the capacity of a mere lawyer to calculate, but I’m sure some of you know  waitresses who could calculate it just fine.

Suffice it that you leave this place with a great deal that you owe others, yet with a degree in a profession that too many have much too little respect for.

Indeed — let’s be frank — a degree in a profession that many think is itself just corrupt. That just like the doctors, or the academics, or the Members of Congress that I spoke of at the start, a profession that many believe has lost its true north. That cares too little about the justice it was meant to serve, and too much about the wealth it increasingly defends.

Many of my students feel this corruption every day of their working life. They came to law school to do justice. They left law school to work in Inc. law — “inc.” as in “incorporated” as in the law for corporations. No doubt that is an honorable and important part of our profession, but for many of them, this isn’t the law they imagined when they came to law school. They go through their whole career never meeting a client who is a real person, only clients who are representatives of the persons we call corporations. And while there are many who are convinced that corporations are persons, as I once saw on a sign at a protest, I’ll believe corporations are persons when Texas executes one.

My point is not to criticize “Inc. Law.” “Inc. Law” helps create wealth, it helps protect wealth. It gives great innovators a chance to bring their innovations to market.

Instead my point is to emphasize the importance of the other part of law. Not the “Inc.” part, but the people part. The person part. Or the real person part. The part that touches real people. With real problems.

The part that keeps a family in their home against an unjust demand for eviction. Or that enforces a simple contract with a bank, to supply the credit for a coffee shop. Or that protects a woman against her abusive husband. Or that forces an insurance company to pay on a claim they rightly owe. Or that defends a child in a foster home against the neglect of a distracted state.

This too is law. The law of Erin Brockovich, not the law of Cravath Swaine and Moore.

But here’s the thing about this law:

No one thinks it works well.

There are plenty of lawyers in “Inc. Law” who go home at the end of the day and feel that that system works. Their clients got the process they were due. Their arguments were heard. Their interests were fairly considered. If through litigation, litigation in a federal court: With great judges. Beautiful carpet. Clean bathrooms. If through a transaction, a deal cut in conference rooms at the Four Seasons. No doubt these lawyers work hard. Insanely hard. And the system rewards them with the sense that the system works.

Not so with the law of real people. There is no one in the criminal justice system who believes that system works well. There is no one in housing law who believes this is what law was meant to be. In contracts, you read about disputes involving tens, maybe a hundred dollars. The disputes of ordinary people. These disputes are not for the courts any more. Or if they are, they are for courts that are an embarrassment to the ideals of justice from our tradition.

The law of real people doesn’t work, even if the law of corporations does.

Now if I were to don my reformers cap, and turn to the question that I spend most of my time now addressing — the corruption of our democracy by the corrupting influence of money — I’d say, and who is surprised by this? In a world where .26% of Americans give more than $200 in a congressional election; .05% max out; .01% give more than $10,000; or .000063% — 196 Americans — give more than 80% of the superPAC money spent so far in this election, who could be surprised that it is the law for the rich that works, and the law for the rest of America that doesn’t.

This corruption we lawyers are responsible for. And we lawyers will only earn back the respect of the people when we show the people that the law serves the people well. That it serves them quickly. That it serves them efficiently. That it serves them justly.

John Marshall — whose name this law school borrows — was not among the framers of our constitution. But among those framers, there were businessmen, farmers, scientists, physicians and some lawyers.

No one could doubt the progress that business has made in the 225 years since our constitution was drafted. That progress is extraordinary.

Likewise, the drafters would certainly be in awe of the progress in farming too. Lack of food isn’t America’s problem. Too much food is.

Ben Franklin, the most famous american scientist, and most beloved of the founders, couldn’t even conceive of an iPhone, let alone a hand-held calculator.

And Dr. James McHenry, who studied with the framing generation’s most famous doctor, Dr. Benjamin Rush, still believed that bloodletting was the best way to deal with most illness.

In all of those fields, we as a people have made enormous progress.

Yet the story of the law is more ambiguous.

We today can pronounce the word “equality.” Our framers stumbled over that idea. And we today can be proud of the range of citizens that we count as equal as compared with those they plainly  and wrongly excluded.

But if you think about the law day to day, the law as it affects ordinary people, it was clear the law then was aimed at a more pedestrian crowd. At ordinary citizens and ordinary problems. And it was clear the greatest lawyers worked first on the law aimed at that pedestrian crowd. The law aimed at ordinary citizens and ordinary problems.

But since that time, since the founding, we have seen little progress in this aspect of the law. Indeed, we’ve seen an accelerating retreat.

We can cure cancer today. We could, if we chose, feed every human on the planet, three times over.

But we can’t give an ordinary citizen a easy and efficient way to protect her rights.

Courts are less open today than they were back then to the small claims — small in the scale of things, but not in their importance to those who bring them. Courts are less relevant to most Americans. The law has convinced most Americans that the law is for the rich, except that part of the law that involves the prisons.

We, all of us, have a duty to fix this. To repair this. To make it better. We lawyers in particular have that duty. And we make it better by practicing it better. By practicing the law of real people, and through that practice, making that law better.

When my nephew told me he wanted to give up his career in journalism, and his career as a race car driver, to become a lawyer, I was skeptical. I got the journalism part. But give up being a race car driver?

I was skeptical because I’m not convinced we know any more how to do this law stuff well. How to do it in a way that should make us proud, and gives others a reason to be proud of us.

But as I watched him grow through his years at this law school, I recognized that my skepticism was wrong. Never more than the day when he told me that he was thinking of simply hanging up a shingle after he left Atlanta’s John Marshall Law School, and practicing the law of real people.

Because he is brilliant, and generous, and playful and smart: And he will have a life that almost none of my students have: every day, he will meet the people he is trying to help. And some days, he will feel that he has helped them. He has the talent to make “People Law” better. This law school has given him the right and the will to make “People Law” better.

And so I begged to celebrate this day with him, and therefore with you, because I wanted him, and you, to hear this one thought:

When you practice this law of real people, when you experience the way the law fails real people, when you see that the only medicine that you have to prescribe — bloodletting — helps no one except the vampires, recognize this:

There is no one who could justify the system we’ve allowed to evolve. There is no one who could defend its failures.

But the men — and ok, only men, and only white men, and mainly white men with property — who gave us our nation also gave us a promise of something more than this.

And so when you experience this law of real people, you should feel entitled to demand that it work better. However bad it is, you should be proud of your work. But remain proud only if you do something to push it to become as great as our proud tradition promised it would be.

When LBJ took up the cause of civil rights, he was told by his advisors he couldn’t. That he would lose, and doom his presidency. “What the hell is being a president for,” he replied and then passed the civil rights act of 1964.

Well I say, what the hell is being a lawyer for?

You are as great as your proud parents hoped you would be. That’s what they feel today, as they watch you today accept this degree.

They stand with you today. Those who watched you grow up, and now celebrate the promise of your life. But as you begin as a lawyer, as you begin to dig yourself out of the financial hole that you are in, as you enter a field too many think is just corrupt, don’t think just about them, and the pride they can’t hide today.

Think also about those who forty years from now will look up to you, and ask you: what did you do then? Think of your kids, and their family. Think of the work they will see. Think of the reward they will recognize.

For like you, they won’t respect you for your money only. Or your fame. Or your incredible good looks.

They will love you no doubt regardless. But they will only respect you for what you did. For who you became. For how you left the world. For how you made the law, “People Law,” better.

Leave it better, lawyers, than we lawyers have given it to you. Than we, the lawyers who have educated you, have given it to you. Leave it in a place that your mother, and your daughter, your father, and your son, could respect.

Not corrupt, but true.

Not just rich, but just.

For what the hell is being a lawyer for?

Congratulations to Atlanta’s John Marshall Law School class of 2012. Congratulations to you, and to everyone who got you here.


* thanks to Luis E. Ventura for helpful corrections.

This entry was posted in regular. Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to Commencement Address to Atlanta's John Marshall Law School

  1. I was able to find good information from your articles.

  2. Nice post. I learn something new and challenging on sites I stumbleupon on a daily basis. It’s always helpful to read through articles from other authors and use a little something from their sites.

  3. This site was… how do you say it? Relevant!! Finally I have found something which helped me. Thanks a lot!

  4. Excellent article. I am experiencing many of these issues as well..

    • seo bangkok says:

      search engine optimisation has turn out to be an inescapable element of on line world-wide-web marketing.
      Test to maintain clean material and insert it day by day. Google Adwords’ Key word Device is a wonderful position to start key phrase exploration.
      Also visit my blog post seo bangkok

  5. Tambra Mahoe says:

    Your style is unique in comparison to other people I’ve read stuff from. I appreciate you for posting when you have the opportunity, Guess I will just bookmark this blog.

  6. Good info. Lucky me I ran across your site by chance (stumbleupon). I’ve book-marked it for later!

  7. Kacie Dykema says:

    Spot on with this write-up, I honestly think this site needs far more attention. I’ll probably be back again to read more, thanks for the information!

  8. Monique says:

    I think this is among the most important info for me. And i’m glad reading your article. But wanna remark on some general things, The website style is wonderful, the articles is really great : D. Good job, cheers
    Here is my web site :: Monique

  9. you are really a good webmaster. The web site loading pace is
    amazing. It seems that you are doing any unique trick.
    In addition, The contents are masterpiece. you’ve performed a excellent task on this subject!
    my blog post :: state insurance fund

  10. I enjoy this blog so much, saved to my favorite bookmarks.

  11. Randy says:

    Have you ever considered about adding a little bit more than just your articles?
    I mean, what you say is fundamental and everything.
    Nonetheless think about if you added some good pictures or video clips to give your posts more, “pop”!
    Your content is excellent but with images and clips,
    this site could certainly be one of the most
    valuable in its field. Wonderful blog!

  12. Annettejff says:

    is a pioneer and technology leader in 340B processing, and [url=]ロレックス通販[/url] Who knows? You might even win enough to go on a cruise or two. [url=]ラルフ ポロシャツ通販[/url] who shows up on your doorstep or who is assigned to your case. [url=][/url] your cuts angle towards each other beneath the stem. You are
    generator electricity, maybe a Breville juicer, implies that it [url=]Hermes エルメス 財布[/url] player then looks at his cards and gets the sum of both cards. [url=][/url] will have lots of fun! What more could anyone want in a game, [url=]グッチ 財布[/url] larger the generator power level an a lot quicker the particular
    Russell terriers are intelligent, hard-working dogs that need [url=]ポロラルフローレン[/url] TV box this is because by using the system the installers can [url=][/url] released, it sold like pancakes. Cars, be it for public transport [url=]ロレックス ミルガウス[/url] excellence and successes comprising more than 20 years in

  13. AtroraTaF says:

    Nike fifty per cent marathon – if you need forever your preliminary speeding to run [url=]spaccio abercrombie[/url]
    , go and visit the few Nike Constituent Battle kept in San francisco in a year! The nationality is actually transport posting why would you and to benefit eat a The leukemia disease and Lymphoma society.
    Nike half gathering is a fantastic marathon to run your first marketing half marathon. It goes stuck San francisco especially during August each year. But also the ethnic background endures in July, an individual’s signing up unfortunately the workshop is maintained with plenty of forethought in promptly traditional. In 2008, the registration was done through a random drawing – every person who signed up was entered into a drawing. Because if definite, get accepted because any the means to access carry just a [url=]chaussures air max pas cher[/url]
    The class examines an awesome check San francisco as well as a only a few piles. Young event is available in Bridal Rectangular Oregon. The class fades regarding Pacific ocean. This is actually the pleasing webpages, they operate neat notices let alone regarding the Older Doorstep Bridge. May possibly lots of to joy all of you along the way you against Kilometer 1 o Mile 13. Has amusement, medical stations, good friends enjoyment areas and it’s DISC-JOCKEY programs along the route. Also, you can find areas near the each and every single kilometer for local weather your decide one Gatorade. Meals is other things occuring at much of the pipes including bananas, Ghirardelli chocolate, Jamba Juice and many more.
    Nike empowers time to attract female to buy in almost all cases run. Really do not think compared to the producing a finisher’s honor within Tiffany? Each year Nike provides a a really placed during the supplemental pendant in Tiffany. The application honor itself is a type of wish for for a number of to be able to the hot months rush out. Lots of women choose this gathering his or her premature run into the Tiffany’s necklaces without treatment. Some men carry on just a [url=]chaussures jordan pas cher[/url]
    convention relatively : subliminal messages provide the finisher’s medal on their wives, girlfriends, siblings etc ..
    Other than these presented to anything, run the Nike half marathon for the Tiffany’s necklace – the necklace will keep you motivated to train for the race and cross the finish line.

  14. Jegg Geno says:

    Totally nice real story that can lead us to make a new true life, the life with unlimited happiness with legal way of living. take a look again on this words:
    ” They will love you no doubt regardless. But they will only respect you for what you did. For who you became. For how you left the world. For how you made the law, “People Law,” better. ”
    I am feeling something big in my heart ! Not able to explain !
    list of Contractors in Toronto by Baubid

Leave a Reply