This isn’t a “diss”: your book “Free Culture” woke me up to these issues. The problem is, you’ve capitulated at every turn. No wonder (in your own words) you couldn’t get the Supreme court to see why reigning in copyright terms was “important”.

Your pet project (Creative commons) explicitly depends on copyright, so CC-licencensees understandably have little — if any — advantage if their stuff goes Public Domain. If the copyright term ends, THEY can no longer enforce the type of controls they want over it (all of that “noncommercial, no-derivs” type stuff in the various deeds.)

Honestly, Doc: I thought that “harmful to minors” thing was awful, but you just continue to dissapoint.

Is this the type of thing we can expect if you get to Congress?