https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3644 2002-2015 Sun, 19 Oct 2008 15:57:42 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.7.2 https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3644#comment-25961 Sun, 19 Oct 2008 15:57:42 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2008/10/remix_released.html#comment-25961 where’s the free pdf?

]]> https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3644#comment-25960 Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:40:40 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2008/10/remix_released.html#comment-25960 re: john
http://remix.lessig.org/remix.php
“Creative Commons Version
The book will be available under a Creative Commons license from Bloomsbury Academic. Stay tuned for launch.”

]]> https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3644#comment-25959 Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:37:11 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2008/10/remix_released.html#comment-25959 Personally, I am deeply suspect of the “bomb thrower” caricaturization Mr Crovitz employs. Though he may claim it is all in good fun. Regardless of his motives, and those of the WSJ editor who selected this review– I don’t know the people involved— the term tends to put you ‘outside the mainstream’. This is always a difficult position to be in when dealing with legal issues, and a profession like the law, which worships, and venerates the alleged “mainstream’. To say nothing of the WSJ readers who worship the same thing. This seems to me to be a gratuitous burden to have inflicted on one. It is an uphill battle as is. And a vicious one.

]]> https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3644#comment-25958 Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:35:32 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2008/10/remix_released.html#comment-25958 where’s the free PDF?

]]> https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3644#comment-25957 Fri, 17 Oct 2008 02:53:34 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2008/10/remix_released.html#comment-25957 Woohoo!!! Congratulations, Professor Lessig!

]]>