Comments on: On Palin's "experience" https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3609 2002-2015 Tue, 30 Dec 2008 03:54:52 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.7.2 By: Jude https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3609#comment-25469 Tue, 30 Dec 2008 03:54:52 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2008/09/on_palins_experience.html#comment-25469 It’s interesting to compare Obama’s current experience with Palin’s; only she had a 20% chance of obtaining the same office. Not entirely sure it is fair but I happen to agree since we aren’t talking about “winning the lottery” odds here.

So when folks answer the question of Palin’s experience with “what about Obama’s experience?”; I have to ask why you think Palin is just as qualified as Obama?

Those posts must have been deleted too…

]]>
By: Scott https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3609#comment-25468 Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:38:37 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2008/09/on_palins_experience.html#comment-25468 Chester Arthur was generally seen as a good President. And what did Agnew’s corruption charges have to do with his experience or lack thereof? These two points make this argument very weak as well as the lack of comparison between Obama and all of the Presidents (I would say that only Lincoln had as little experience as Obama, unless of course you discount Arthur’s brief Vice Presidency; And Lincoln’s success makes this the overall point weak as well.) Oh, well, it doesn’t matter now anyway.

]]>
By: billy https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3609#comment-25467 Sun, 07 Dec 2008 13:58:00 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2008/09/on_palins_experience.html#comment-25467 Brief correction on ages: You state that Al Gore was 4 years Palin’s junior, but they were both 44 at the time of their campaign for VP. Gore was born in 1948 + 44 = 1992 campaign. Palin was born in 1964 + 44 = 2008 campaign.

]]>
By: D man https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3609#comment-25466 Fri, 31 Oct 2008 07:29:30 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2008/09/on_palins_experience.html#comment-25466 Mrs. Palin only looks good,. she has shit for brains and you obviously are a fool. Everyone has been knowing Alaska has oil. She’s not an Engineer of sorts that came up with some great plan, in fact I think she gave tax breaks to the companys for the money they receive up there. But I’m just a simple Blackman, but 1 daughter has her Masters for a few years and the younger is working toward her Doctorate. Both way smater thanh Ms. Palin. I voted Republican for many years, yet I question the judgement of Mc Cain at this point. He;s very unstable and she as far as I’m concerned is IDIOT !!! She is dangerous with half a brain and her husband the
PIMP will try to run things just as he does in Alaska !!! FOOL’s that;s exactly what you are !!!

]]>
By: Nathan Williams https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3609#comment-25465 Thu, 09 Oct 2008 07:45:58 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2008/09/on_palins_experience.html#comment-25465 I think that this is the most obsured video and pointless act of politics anyone could have came up with. I mean come on- saying that Sarah Palin is inexperienced like the one (eventhough looney for this decision) Obama supporter below me, HYPOCRTICAL is all this is. May I suggest that Barack Hussein Obama served 143 days in the Senate before being elected? Sarah Palin served on a state level for two years plus in a political standpoint.

Not to mention, just because John McCain is old, does NOT mean he will certainly die while in office. I think the Obama supporters who want to run this in the ground about him being too old need to step back and look- John McCain’s mother is 98 and still alive. Longevity in some cases runs genetically. Therefore, the death of McCain no longer poses an eminate threat to the US citizens, as Sarah Palin would be elected to Vice President only and would not be shifted to a presidency.

Now before you start to make another attacking, elementary, and most certainly party destorying little character of play as this seemingly high tech shot at Governor Palin explains, KNOW YOUR FACTS, USE YOUR BRAIN, AND GET REAL- MCCAIN-PALIN 2008 IS THE BEST CHOICE.

]]>
By: Johnny M https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3609#comment-25464 Sun, 05 Oct 2008 15:50:33 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2008/09/on_palins_experience.html#comment-25464 What executive experience does John McCain have? Crashing planes?

The answer is, NONE!

Clearly there is only one experienced candidate for president this year, and that is Sarah Palin!

]]>
By: mudlock https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3609#comment-25463 Thu, 02 Oct 2008 23:31:27 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2008/09/on_palins_experience.html#comment-25463 Interesting, but I don’t find it convincing. Okay, so 44 of the previous 46 vice presidents had more experience (at the federal level or as state executives) than she did. As you say, so what? But then you go through some tangent on how the VP role isn’t an issue but McCain might die; that’s not convincing.

Abraham Lincoln had less experience, on both counts, than all the previous presidents except Zachary Taylor (and Obama has only slightly more than Lincoln). And yet, Lincoln is very highly regarded. Overall, experience doesn’t seem to have tracked presidential performance [ref.]. Obviously, lack of experience is a point of concern, but it’s not insurmountable, assuming there is some other compelling attribute. Therefore, I think it would be best to keep the focus more on her performance (limited as it is, but what’s there is unsettling), her viewpoints (which should be more than a little horrifying to most moderates, to say nothing of liberals), and how well informed she is (which is to say “abysmally poorly”).

We’ll see how the debate goes tonight.

]]>
By: Steve Baba https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3609#comment-25462 Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:21:42 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2008/09/on_palins_experience.html#comment-25462 In addition to the obvious counterargument that if Palin in too inexperienced then Obama is also…., it appears that Democrats (mostly online extremists) have so lowered expectations that Palin is bound to rebound

From LA Times (blog only?)
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/09/sarah-palin-m-5.html

How Democrats set Sarah Palin up to “win” Thursday’s VP Debate.

The upcoming downside for the Obama-Biden campaign is that its supporters became so flustered over Palin’s surprisingly explosive popularity coming out of the GOP convention. They have so successfully mocked, derided and lowered expectations for Palin in Thursday night’s VP debate that if she doesn’t drool or speak in tongues, many millions still open to persuasion will be impressed.

]]>
By: IG REPORT https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3609#comment-25461 Mon, 29 Sep 2008 06:54:25 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2008/09/on_palins_experience.html#comment-25461 Good history lesson and must agree with several others on this inexperience stuff. We must move on to better issues than this. George, good on the climate stuff. It does make you wonder who is banking on this. This goes both Obama and Palin, if just making a trip and/or meeting with heads of state give you experience, well hell, there are a lot of experienced people to chose from. The simple fact is that there are few who actually deal with world leaders. To you who want to run for office, make sure you get a passport and travel somewhere because that is now considered experience.

IG

]]>
By: Wes https://archives.lessig.org/?p=3609#comment-25460 Sun, 28 Sep 2008 11:05:22 +0000 http://lessig.org/blog/2008/09/on_palins_experience.html#comment-25460 You don’t want a president who makes good decisions, per se; because that’s impossible. You don’t want a president who decides whether Iraq has WMD based on his gut; because making good decisions with one’s gut is impossible. What you want is a president who can preside over the various government agencies so that the government agencies make good decisions. You don’t want a president deciding, based on his gut, that Iraq has WMD and then pressuring the intelligence agencies to go along with that decision. You want a president who is capable of accepting good decisions as the good decisions percolate up from the depths of the relevant government agencies.

Obama has broad theoretical training in how the federal government is supposed to work (having taught constitutional law), he has a broad range of life experiences to draw on so he’ll be able to do basic sanity checking on the decisions percolating up from the depths of the relevant government agencies and he comes across as fairly levelheaded. While McCain has a lot of practical experience with the federal government, McCain tends to be quite erratic (taking risks and making mistakes) and it’s not really clear that McCain learns from his mistakes. While Palin has “executive” experience, that executive experience is extremely narrow. It’s unlikely that knowing how the Alaska state government functions is going to give her much insight into how the federal government functions. More generally, the range of Palin’s experiences on all aspects of life are quite narrow: she will not be able to sanity check the decisions percolating up from the relevant government agencies against her own life experiences.

]]>