But thirteenth in broadband adoption. The amazing non-issue of this campaign.
-
Archives
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- November 2002
- October 2002
- September 2002
- August 2002
-
Meta
every country other than the USA uses government policy to stimulate broadband subscription directly.
Who cares about that, when the world is at stake?
In all fairness, the U.S. has a more rural population than Korea, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Japan, and Singapore. The “last mile” problem is a real problem in those rural areas.
So, the Digital Divide is alive and well. In 2000 it was a key talking point for the presidential candidates. 2004? Zero. Zilch. Nada. Bigger issues this time around, perhaps, but it also tells me that neither candidate understands the profundity of the problem.
Canada (which, Tom, does have large rural areas) made internet connectivity a priority. All levels of government have played a key role. This continues with things like civic public wireless programs. Private enterprise will take you a certain part of the way, but to get to the good part of the graph – which means even your less affluent people have access – you have to have government support.
Actually it is an issue for both candidates: http://www.ghandchi.com/324-BroadbandEng.htm
Bush:
“This country needs a national goal for broadband technology, for the spread of broadband technology. We ought to have a universal, affordable access for broadband technology by the year 2007, and then we ought to make sure as soon as possible thereafter, consumers have got plenty of choices when it comes to purchasing the broadband carrier. See, the more choices there are, the more the price will go down. And the more the price goes down, the more users there will be. And the more users there will be, the more likely it is America will stay on the competitive edge of world trade.”
Kerry Campaign:
“Empower Americans by Making Internet Access Universally Available. As more commerce and service occurs over the Internet, John Kerry believes that we need to make Internet access available to all families. Several generations ago the Rural Electric Administration brought isolated areas out of the darkness. Similarly a visionary Federal government will build a bridge across the digital divide and bring the promise of broadband technology to rural and urban America. Kerry supports providing a tax credit to telecommunications companies that deploy broadband in rural and underserved parts of America.”
I found it hillarious when both candidates paid lip service to broadband. It wasn’t like one was going to come out against broadband, “My fellow Americans, my opponent wants everybody to have fast internet access. Why? Elect me, and I’ll make sure there’s a dial-up in every house.”
I know, I know, the issue is how the US should encourage broadband. And, while I have a sneaky suspicion that Kerry wants to use a government program to fix things, and that Bush would rather have the states or the market figure it out, I don’t believe either has actually said so.
“The amazing non-issue of this campaign.”
Amazing?
Where are your priorities? We are at war in two countries, under threat of terrorist attack, and in a recession. The national debt is skyrocketing, the price of oil is at a historical high and the social security Ponzi scheme is headed for trouble.
Yet you’re worried that too many people use dial-up AOL?
An interesting stat, yes. Amazing that it hasn’t been a major issue in this campaign? Not in the least.
Who gives a shit? Read a book or something while you wait for your download. Better still, go outside and get some fresh air.
Has anyone read about the social problems that high rates of high speed connectivity have caused for youth and family life in Korea. It’s kind of perverse. I would rather have my kid out smoking pot with his friends than doing what these kids do.
Crude population density chart for the same countries.
(data from this site)(persons per sq km)(each asterisk ~= 10 people/sq km)
Thanks, HKerry, for the quotes. However, as I said, in 2000 Internet connectivity and the Digital Divide were on the tips of all candidates’ tongues and the rhetoric from all political camps made the issue of Internet access appear crucial for the well-being of our economy and way of life.
The larger, and perhaps tangential issue, is that of jobs. If Americans are still plagued by a Digital Divide when other countries are not, it’s less likely we’ll be able to find enough skilled workers. If our economy is supposed to move toward the tertiary, we’re sure as hell not making it easy. That’s part of the profundity I was referring to.
I could probably find each candidate’s stance on getting dogs and cats spayed and neutered, but does that mean it’s a priority for them? Does that mean they understand the [relative] importance of the problem?
Lessig,
It is people like you who prevent the US (the World) from technology growth. Supporting closed minded companies like Apple prevent the world fron innovating the future.
This covers broadband subscribers; is there data on total broadband access, including access at public institutions such as Universities? Does an apartment building that subscribes to a T1 line and provides broadband to each unit count each unit as a separate subscriber?
The problem is the deregulation of telecommunications, and the fact that the FCC has in almost every case sold us out.
Other nations are spurring ISP’s to adopt fiber (passive optical networking) infrastructures.
Here, our isp’s are allowed to get away with such things as charing 3 times as much for the same service from several years ago as the consumption of the copper/cable exceeds capacity.
Because we dont encourage competition, and because we dont encourage adoption of fiber infrastructure we are falling behind.
Japan already has massive fiber infrastructure, as do many nations… we have diddly squat if i remember correctly.. we’re still taking baby steps only this year.
I would like to add something plainly obvious…
The internet went from a tool for economic growth before the recession to the ultimately villified tool of piracy in the following economic hardship.
may i ask why anyone would invest in internet technology when it and all which interface with it are being villified.