Those radicals in Holland have protected the right of a search engine to search for MP3. (Thanks to Branko Collin)
-
Archives
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- November 2002
- October 2002
- September 2002
- August 2002
-
Meta
The linked article says: “The charge had been brought by BREIN”. I don’t know what ‘bringing charge’ means, but to me it sounds like BREIN were the ones that filed the law suit, and that’s not the case. ZoekMP3.nl were the ones that wanted a pre-emptive judgement that what they were doing was legal. BREIN had been trying to bully them (and had been successful with others, IIRC) into closing shop.
Also, stating that BREIN are the RIAA of the Netherlands is a nice condensation, an easy label for foreigners to understand. In reality, they claim to represent a diverse group of middlemen from the music and movie ‘industries’ (their word, not mine), but mostly levy collection agencies such as Buma/Stemra, Sena and Videma. (And they also claim to represent the Motion Picture Association.)
What is also remarkable, is that the Judge in his verdict has explicitly stated that downloading on its own is legal. Only the unauthorized publication of a work can be infringing. This has been an unclear point for some time and the judge put it quite clearly. Here is the quote:
Anderzijds heeft de wetgever blijkens zowel de huidige Auteurswet en de Wet op de naburige rechten als de reeds genoemde Richtlijn en het daaruit voortvloeiende Wetsontwerp bepaald dat op zichzelf het kopi�ren (in dit geval door middel van downloaden) van een inbreukmakend/illegaal mp3-bestand voor eigen gebruik, geen strijd met de Auteurswet of de wet op de naburige rechten oplevert. Het downloaden van bestanden met behulp van de faciliteiten en diensten van Techno Design, is derhalve in beginsel niet inbreukmakend noch onrechtmatig. Slechts indien de gebruiker van het gedownloade bestand dit weer verveelvoudigt of openbaar maakt kan er sprake zijn van inbreukmakend handelen door die persoon.
My own english translation (ianal, so forgive my lapses)
On the other hand the legislator has according to the current Copyright Law and the Law on Neighbouring rights and the already mentioned Guideline and the corresponding draft legislation determined that, on its own, copying (in this case by downloading) of a infringing/illegal mp3-file for private use, is not a violation of the Copyright law or the Law Neighbouring Rights. Downloading files using the services and facilities of Techno Design is, consequently, in principle not infringing nor illegal. Only if the user copies or publicises the downloaded file could there be an infringement by that person.
Best Regards,
Sander
Put Lessig In Jail. Start at the top.
The main point of the verdict is that a search engine just can’t tell if a file is illegal or legal, when indexing a site. So, basically it cannot held to be responsible for linking to illegal content.
But, Zoekmp3.nl, the search engine, will have to remove links to illegal MP3s from its database, if someone can point out those files are illegal.
We seem to be going somewhat nutty up here in Canada as well.
In a recent ruling — and I’m not sure if this is covered earlier in the Blog — a lower court found that music sharing is not illegal under current Canadian law: “Making files available in online, shared directories is within the bounds of Canadian copyright law, von Finckenstein ruled.” http://www.cbc.ca/stories/2004/03/31/canada/download_court040331
The Supreme Court of Canada also recently found (unanimously) that the Law Society’s of Upper Canada (i.e. Ontario) was not infringing on copyright laws in allowing people to photocopy whole decisions from commercial reporters: “The Law Society of Upper Canada is not breaking copyright law by photocopying legal decisions for lawyers and researchers, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled Thursday.” http://www.cbc.ca/stories/2004/03/04/canada/lawscoc040304
Dear Professor Lessig:
I’m reading your book. Even though I have my own problems with the abuses of Big Media, I am not pursuaded that the situation is hopeless. The Internet provides many opportunities for small copyright owners to distrubute and profit from their work. I am a cse in point, having recently put some of my previously published work up on Amazon.com and Powells.com for sale. It can be done.
I am making sales.
The biggest problem with the Copyright Act, as I see it, is that it fails to provide an even playing field for all creators. Certainly, under the current adminstration, there are no cases of large media concerns being prosecuted for copyright infrigemrnt and related crimes, especially violations of Section 1202.
Large media concerns seem to feel if they ignore small copyright holders, they will go away, forcing us to the expense of filing legal actions to just get their attention. This, some of us are willing to do..
The pending legislation called The PIRATE Act would help correct this. You might take a look. Also check out my blog “The Fight For Copyright” at [email protected]. Feel free to comment there.
Fair is fair.
Sincerely, Francis Hamit
Under the terms of the Digital Millenium Copyright Act the RIAA fills there boots with “levies” on all unrecorded media, most which is used by the computing industry.
Apart from making more net profit on the tapes, cdr and dvdr’s than the companies that actually make and distribute it, these levies were put in place precisely to compensate the RIAA and less so artists for copright infringment.
Being paid for the song, movie etc and being paid for the media it is recorded on is double dipping and it is beyond me how consumers and developers and distributors of unrecorded media have not launched a class action against the RIAA!!!!!