According to friends at the wonderful Bumperactive.com, Starbucks says it has no policy about non-media photographs in its stores. Someone should tell the stores…
-
Archives
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- November 2002
- October 2002
- September 2002
- August 2002
-
Meta
Really? A little web-searching turned up this blog entry, from MARCH 2002:
http://www.nedbatchelder.com/blog/200203.html#e20020331T163851
Weasly Starbucks Sunday 31 March 2002
We were walking downtown today, and wanted a snack, so we stopped in
at a Starbucks. Now, of course, all the tables were occupied with
people who had clearly been there at least an hour. Don’t get me
started on the difficulty of finding somewhere to sit at these places,
because that’s not my point.
As we approached the counter to order our stuff, a man stood up from a
table of about eight people, and was going to take a picture of all
his friends around the table. The guy behind the counter called out,
“Sir, I’m sorry, but there’s no taking pictures here.”
“What?”
“It’s company policy, you can’t take pictures in here.”
The customer looked bewildered, incredulous, and annoyed and didn’t
take the picture. I asked the guy behind the counter why there’s no
pictures allowed. He said, “The company doesn’t want pictures to end
up in magazines, so all pictures have to go through corporate
communications.”
How dumb is this? Here’s a customer clearly having a good time in the
store, and wants to take a picture of his friends. He’s got a typical
point-and-shoot camera for taking snapshots. Because Starbucks is
worried about the less-than-microscopic chance that this picture will
end up in a magazine and somehow make Starbucks look bad (how,
exactly?), they’ve squashed these peoples’ good time, and made
themselves look like the corporate weasels they are in front of at
least twenty customers. Nice going.
Why do big corporations have to act like such soulless control freaks,
even when it is in their own worst interest?
I also got kicked out of Starbucks for trying to make a little mini movie of myself (just happened to be in Starbucks). I did however keep the footage and I secretly made a cool little imovie… someday when I have some decent server space I’ll post it.
There’s no such thing as bad publicity. Especially in a world of spin.
Every Starbucks is a little different, thank God:-) The one near my home has a wonderful atmosphere and would never ever confuse a happy customer with the media mafia.
Every Starbucks is a little different, thank God:-) The one near my home has a wonderful atmosphere and would never ever confuse a happy customer with the media mafia.
Just go and try, they can’t be that different on this fact
Ok – I will take you up on the challenge! Will post a picture as proof – maybe as soon as tomorrow,
E.
I can say it is true with first hand knowledge. It is not a compnay policy. It is misinformed or stupid mangers and employees. If you have an issue with a store mistreating you call the customer service number 800-782-7282. Complaint to that store. They may get “written up”.
I work for Starbucks, and I assure you, that there is no “company policy” against taking pictures. If you come in with a film crew or want to shoot your student film, we will direct you to the media department for permission. If you are having a good time and want to make a Kodak moment, then by all means go for it, as long as no other customers are being disturbed. If an employee gets out of control, ask for their district managers number and report them. Starbucks is a large company. Don’t judge us all by the actions of a few.
I am wondering where the two employees of Starbucks got there information because the Resorce Manual I trained from said that we were not to permit picture taking inside the store. Now, we all use the same manuals so I am wondering if your they have a more narrow meaning than they are worded, but I have politely asked people not to take pictures in all the stores I have worked in and never had a problem- but I never took their cameras or anything after they took one. A lot of it is the way the customer is approached and I don’t see why it should be a big deal.
The picture taking issue really has to do with trademarks and using the Starbucks logo with out the permission of the owner. If someone takes a picture in my store, I asked them politly to please not take any more pictures in the store. It is true that one must obtain any permission through the proper channels if they want a picture. Anyways, the people are on private property and they have to listen to the people who work there or they could leave if they do not like it. Rules are rules. Deal with it.