We’ve collected many great stories about the burden of copyright relevant to our case, Kahle v. Ashcroft. You can see them here. Please add more.
-
Archives
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- November 2002
- October 2002
- September 2002
- August 2002
-
Meta
Because copyright dominion will be based on the same technologies as the security qualities, authentication, integrity, confidentiality, and non-repudiation, we need to keep up with those technologies.
The first best place is Bruce Schneier’s; he announces:
“Blog: Crypto-Gram is now available in blog form. Called “Schneier on Security,” the blog will have the same content as Crypto-Gram but it will be posted continually rather than only on the 15th of the month. Initially, blog comments will be turned off. I’ll enable them as soon as my anti-blog-spam software is working.
“RSS: The Crypto-Gram RSS feed has been working for about six months now. Current RSS subscribers will receive the blog version of Crypto-Gram instead of the once-a-month version.”
See http://www.schneier.com/blog/
A blog to see every time it is possible.
Gianfranco Ramoser
Larry:
i’m quite concerned that Senator Kerry’s Mary Cheney debate comment has doomed our candidate. I’m not sure how our debate prep team could have suggested this as a strategic move. Nor am I certain why exactly Kerry embraced it. Isn’t it fairly obvious that you shouldn’t use your opponent’s child to try to score a political point? Is the campaign so cocooned that it self-reinforces terrible ideas/strategy?
Maybe McAuliffe is to blame. If we had stuck to a longer primary schedule, maybe Kerry’s judgement issues would have surfaced before it was too late….. ARGGGGG.
One point that might be better addressed in the matter of orphaned works’ barrier presentation is that the daunting nature of locating copyright owners and getting permissions has a “chilling effect” AND strongly encourages deliberate scoffing of the law.
Amusing (?) sidelight: is the use of copyright material in a copyright presentation excusable? I was thinking of the televising of the trademarks on bats during baseball games.
Love.