The good souls at the Center for the Study of Complex Systems at the University of Michigan have come up with a fantastically suggestive way of seeing the relationships between “money and government.” Here for example is contributions to the Senate by industry and sector. Here you can see contributions by entities that received TARP funding. Wonderful work that will feed lots of insight and reflection.
-
Archives
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- November 2002
- October 2002
- September 2002
- August 2002
-
Meta
Except the visualisations are not exactly very good. Very cluttered and give too much information simultaneously – they should take a lesson from this neat visualisation that shows where the money goes in US trade.
Really it would be cool to connect this data up to Represent – NY Times…
Hi David,
Right, as we acknowledge in the description of these visualizations, they are very cluttered. In one sense, this is a demonstration of an intrinsic property of the underlying data. In another sense, there are very serious and sensitive questions that arise when it comes to “aggregation” and “simplification.” Many rightly wonder whether “aggregation” and “simplification” are really code words for “I tweaked the results until I got the conclusion I desired.” To avoid those issues up front, we provided these.
We are working on simpler, interactive visualizations and movies, but for the sake of full, honest disclosure, those larger graphs will stay there as they are, just as complicated as the reality of the matter.
Thanks,
Mike
Hi David,
Right, as we acknowledge in the description of these visualizations, they are very cluttered. In one sense, this is a demonstration of an intrinsic property of the underlying data. In another sense, there are very sensitive questions when it comes to “aggregation” and “simplification.” Many rightly wonder whether “aggregation” and “simplification” are really code words for “I tweaked the results until I got the conclusion I desired.”
We are working on simpler, interactive visualizations and movies, but for the sake of full, honest disclosure, those larger graphs will stay online, as-is.
Thanks,
Mike
Maybe they can make a graph of the great, unrepresented mass of citizens who don’t contribute financially and who don’t vote. They could connect them and their non-contributions to the kind of party and kind of candidate who would represent their predilections if they did contribute and did vote. Then we would have a better idea of what kind of candidates and political parties will exist when state funding of elections magically makes these self-selected, non-participants into active participants of the system they, heretofore, have opted out of.
I would really like that. Because if they did, it might scare the shit out of Prof. Lessig and others who worry about this great unwashed mass, whom they believe are, somehow, zeroed out by the current regime. I run into many of these non-participants on a daily basis. They are, after all, four out of every ten Americans. Every time I meet one of these who don’t participate or vote; I thank my lucky stars they don’t.
What the hell is your problem Lessig?
You voted democratic and it is the democrats who want to increase government into every nook and crany of your life, which will require more money. And since the US Constitution, you know what that is right?, guarantes the right to petition government, there will be more corruption.
Why did you vote democratic if you want money out of politics?
Why aren’t you a Libertarian?
BTW: What are you teaching at Harvard law school? (God help us if it’s conlaw)
Not to worry. The federal gov’t will soon have all our money via taxes and debt. That’ll fix the problem of “relationships between money and government” once and for all.
“Oh what a tangled web we weave…”