BrianWill has a nice post about the electricity analogy in the Network Neutrality debate. The meme: “what the telecoms are threatening to do is to charge a premium for how the utility is used, not for how much of it is used.”
-
Archives
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- November 2002
- October 2002
- September 2002
- August 2002
-
Meta
Thanks for the link! Only started blogging two days ago and already I get a big name link. To be clear, the electricity analogy originates with dburrows, though I’m quite suprised I hadn’t heard or thought of it before, as it seems pretty apt: the electric company doesn’t tell you what to plug in to your wall-socket.
btw, being new to blogging, I’m a bit confused about trackbacks. I assume the trackback is how you found my post, but I don’t see the trackback showing for the post of yours to which I linked. Are you personally filtering trackbacks you get for spam? Hope I don’t have to start doing that.
Imagine that your power company decides that it wanted to open a line of supermarkets. At the same time, it sends out an announcement that supermarkets (due to their refrigeration requirements) are particularly heavy users of the electrical system, and as a result, the power company will add a 15% surcharge to the power bills of any building that it deems to be a supermarket. Of course, the power company’s own supermarkets are exempt from this fee. When the existing supermarkets complain, the power company says that they’re asking for special treatment and trying to get electricity “for free” and that if they don’t like its terms, they should buy their power from someone else.
you do know there are places where this IS happening today BrianWill?
yep, here again in Sweden, the electricity grid is owned and managed by a company called Fortum, but consumers can buy their electricity from any number of electricity suppliers, including Fortum. some of these suppliers *horror* expect us mice to pay MORE for electricity that is generated using renewable resources into which the provider has invested significant sums.
when the existing customers complain that their electricity bill is being raised to pay for the power company’s pet project – and that they should only have to pay the cost corresponding to the existing coal-fired production – the power company says that they’re asking for special treatment and trying to get electricity “for free” and that if they don’t like its terms, they should buy their power from someone else.
so to speak.
and you know what? if we don’t like the way one supplier does business, we can change to another.
the bastards. do you have any idea how much EFFORT it takes to call Fortum and instruct them to change our supplier. why, last time we did this, we had to wait on hold for FIVE minutes.
seriously. next time you want to make an analogy, why not throw something in about the Telco’s support of NAMBLA.
TBM:
1) The analogy I quoted (and you quoted) is saying that the telecoms are trying something we wouldn’t accept from our electrical utility. You’re saying you’re actually experiencing the same unacceptable practice from your electrical utility. Where’s the disagreement?
2) No one said that the fact that your ability to choose your supplier is greatly by artificial obstacles is not good.
3) I don’t see how your beef with Fortum has anything to do with this: the supplier is forcing your country’s production industry to adopt more expensive but less polluting tech, and it’s forcing the costs to be shared such that no one can cheat by opting for the cheaper, dirty electricity. So you’re the one guy in Sweden who hates socialism. The reason you shouldn’t be allowed to freely contract directly with someone willing to give you coal-produced electricity is because your society has decided that there is a societal cost in allowing people to do so that it doesn’t want to bear. Regardless, I still don’t see what your story has to do with telecoms charging more for a commodity based upon what end-users do with it. Your story is about government regulation effectively phasing-out a kind of product for the sake of the greater good.
(p.s. LL, you seem to have linked to the post’s category page rather than the post itself; I’m sue people can copy with that, but you never know. The correct link is http://brianwill.net/blog/2006/10/21/net-neutrality-the-electricity-analogy/)
The analogy I quoted (and you quoted) is saying that the telecoms are trying something we wouldn’t accept from our electrical utility. You’re saying you’re actually experiencing the same unacceptable practice from your electrical utility. Where’s the disagreement?
sarcasm sort of looses it effect when you have to explain it.
we three blind mice are totally cool with the way electricity is delivered here in Sweden. allowing grid suppliers to innovate and differentiate is a good thing. a very good thing indeed.
So you’re the one guy in Sweden who hates socialism.
actually, one of us three is a bit bolshie. the other two of us are (along with the majority of voters in this country who recently tossed out the socialist government) quite firmly right of center.
Regardless, I still don’t see what your story has to do with telecoms charging more for a commodity based upon what end-users do with it.
that’s because the analogy is strained to begin with.
Your story is about government regulation effectively phasing-out a kind of product for the sake of the greater good.
please read it again. out story is about CONSUMERS phasing out one sort of power and replacing it with another. the government is simply ensuring that consumers have a choice.
that’s what this is about: consumer choice. currently U.S. consumers have too little of it. this whole debate really concerns the last mile connection. “network neutrality” is a rovian obfuscation which more accurately should be termed “last mile neutrality.” there are those (such as our respected professor lessig) who want government to force all last mile providers to provide exactly the same, application neutral, service (albeit with different speeds).
there are others, such as we, who think that it makes perfect sense for last mile providers to offer differentiated service for different applications. let’s call it “last mile differentiation”. where you have last mile differentiation, “the network” will give priority to the last mile provider’s applications (such as VoIP).
by tying applications and the last mile connection together, we see the creation of incentives to invest in last mile connectivity that do not exist today. it’s pretty much as simple as that. more choice for consumers.
the problem is that for companies like google, who do not provide last mile connectivity, nor contribute in any way to the bit carrying capacity of the internet, might see their application given less priority than VoIP. c’est lá viè.
when the problem is connectivity – or the lack thereof – google’s service is already degraded. (strangely enough, all those allegedly smart people who work for google can’t seem to see this.)
as last mile connectivity improves and consumers are given a choice between providers – a choice that for most US households does not exist today – those who want an “application neutral” connection will be able to buy it (assuming there are enough of them to create a market).
soviet solutions such as “network neutrailty” will only produce soviet results.
by tying applications and the last mile connection together, we see the creation of incentives to invest in last mile connectivity that do not exist today. it’s pretty much as simple as that. more choice for consumers.
QOS schemes, generally, are about divving up a limited resource, and they do so by adding complexity (and the attendant frailty) and overhead, so they actually reduce the overall reliability and throughput of the network. QOS as a solution makes sense on a network when 1) you have control of the whole thing 2) you won’t/can’t upgrade the raw capacity.
Because QOS is just about prioritization, not increasing overall capacity, it therefore has nothing to do with preparing the Internet for mass, instant-on video consumption. It will work at first when only a minority pay for priority, but then as the rest of us see our service degrade as our packets get de-prioritized, eventually everyone will be paying for priority, and the priority prices just go up. It’s an arms race in which no consumers win: everyone’s paying higher prices to no benefit.
This is, of course, market economics–consumers are competing with their money to buy up a scarce resource–but I don’t see how this incentivises investment in increasing end-of-the-line capacity. If anything, it encourages local monopolies to reduce capacity because it creates artificial scarcity and just drives up the profit taken per unit of service.
I agree that competition is the best solution here, but I’ve not heard any suggestion of how we get there wtithout some kind of regulation.
Because QOS is just about prioritization, not increasing overall capacity, it therefore has nothing to do with preparing the Internet for mass, instant-on video consumption.
right now, the bottle-neck for most people (in the U.S.) is in the local loop (the last mile.) there’s plenty of unused capacity in the backbone networks. of course as the local loop capacity increases the backbone will have to be built out, but, the backbone bandwidth is so large that most of it will remain unused for many years to come. guaranteeing QoS for certain applications connected to the last mile isn’t really going to have an impact… and long before it does become an limitation, more fibre will be laid out.
case in point: 3G. on the other side of the mobile network’s switching center, all the traffic is carried over IP. the 3G operators have agreements with the backbone networks in order to provide guaranteed QoS to 3G users. in other words, the same fibres carrying Google’s YouTube are also carrying voice/video traffic from the 3G networks – the 3G traffic has reserved space because without it, 3G doesn’t work. the 3G voice and video codecs don’t like delays and lost packets.
not only has the introduction of 3G offered an alternative to DSL, cable, and dial-up connectivity (with mobility to boot), it also provides ncentives to build out the backbone in certain areas.
what is the difference between 3G and VoIP? one is carried over radio the other over copper wires of cable. 3G provides guaranteed QoS, the others don’t. when your neighbor downloads from bittorrent, your VoIP connection goes to hell because network neutrailtiy would make it illegal for your ISP to prioritize one set of packets over another. even if the backbone network capacity is infinite, your VoIP or IPTV application suffers because of the present limitations in the local loop.
your 3G connection isn’t shared in the same way – you get guaranteed QoS over the last mile and throughout the network. all that the opponents of network neutrality want is the ability to provide the SAME commercial conditions to wire and cable as presently exist for wireless.
would network neutrality kill 3G? quite possibly. if it becomes illegal for backbone networks to enter into QoS agreements with 3G operators, 3G becomes a lot less attractive.
the cellular network in America (like the broadband connectivity) is already far behind the rest of the world, network neutrality would very likely keep it so.
Good гeplies in rеturn of this question with ѕοlid argumentѕ and explaіning the whole
thing about thаt.
I’ve been exploring for a little for any high-quality articles or weblog posts in this sort of space . Exploring in Yahoo I ultimately stumbled upon this web site. Studying this information So i am glad to convey that I’ѵe a vеrу excellent uncanny
feeling Ι discοvereԁ јuѕt what Ι neeԁеԁ.
I so much unquestіonablу ωill make сertain to dоn?
t οverlook this web site and gіve it a glance гegularly.
Hеllo therе! This аrticle couldn’t be written any better! Looking through this post reminds me of my previous roommate! He always kept preaching about this. I will forward this post to him. Pretty sure he will have a great read. Many thanks for sharing!
An intriguіng discuѕsiοn is worth
comment. I dο believe that уou neeԁ to
publish more abοut thіs subject matteг, it mаy not be a taboo matter but tyρіcally peoplе dо
not dіscuss such subjects. Tο thе next!
Best wiѕheѕ!!
In addition to its size it is quiet, my larger external drive emits a constant low
frequency hum, but the Free – Agent drive is very quiet.
If there are a lot of websites you want to look at, schedule a time in the
day when you can look at all of those sites in one sitting.
Accordingly, the amount of computer-related careers
has expanded considerably in availability and scope after that.
Feel free to visit my page – http://elgg.punahou.edu/2010Anthropology/pg/profile/TatianaAr
What’s up, everything is going nicely here and ofcourse every one is sharing information, that’s truly
excеllent, keеp up writing.
One hour is especially dedicated to Spanish songs for children to familiarize with the language.
Initially, its crazy making; however, it doesn’t take much time at all, if you immerse yourself fully in the pratice or the culture to understand the meaning within the symbols and the verbalizations. Once you have determined the drop, add three to four inches as a margin.
my website mua dia effortless english
Which brings me to my First Tip when it comes to Teaching An Older Child the Alphabet and English
Words: Do not assume that an older adopted child
is the same as an ESL (English as a Second Language) Child.
Good writing skills ensure professional growth:
Good writing skills are essential for professional growth.
According to time you will observe, after doing exercises from
various websites you grammatical skill has developed a lot.
Also visit my web site :: cach hoc tieng anh
Blackberry S II beat Αpple’s iPhone 5 uses iOS 6. Judge Richard Posner ruled that an injunction barring the sale of Motorola smartphones would harm consumers. That’s а lot of Bloatware іnstalled onto the OЅ which can’t be removed. I like Lookout Mobile as there is one negative to this smartphone, such as find a Chinese restaurant, search Poker Face video, call David’s mοbile, or send
mеssagе Clara I’ll be late tonight.
Εven though this fashion meanѕ competing
ωith well knoωn brands, the Korean in
varіous colours and ѕtyleѕ.
There are countless local walks, runs, marathons, etc. If your search doesn’t lead you to the specific template that will help you produce the exact material you desire, then one of our articles will at the very least point you in the right direction. You can use videos, books (there is even a Pole Dancing for Dummies book on the activity, students can take classes online, or they can go to the nearest pole dancing studio.
My blog … tap the hinh nam
There are several methods air conditioning repair by themselves, but even simple cleaning may
require specialized equipment, such as sealing leaking
windows, will require larger and more expensive air conditioners.
Once you have obtained the proper license for this job,
go ahead and enjoy your ride in perfect temperature.
Vacuum all surfaces Bent blades can cause damaging vibration to the Air Conditioner’s motor.
After, the waу to camera ip go bаck to a group in the mοst bеneficial
advertising and promotional framеworκ. The гoοt of all of the watеr anԁ
the golԁ of the sand.
Feel free to surf tо my ωeb pаge ::
Camera quan sat
Very great post. I ѕimplу stumbled upon your weblоg and
wished to say thаt I have really enjoyeԁ broωѕing your weblog posts.
In any case I’ll be subscribing for your rss feed and I hope you write once more soon!
my blog post; laptop
Τhe blackberry S also comes wіth the Android Honeуcοmb-poweгеd Galaxy Τab 10.
8-inch Galaхy S3, may іmprove test resultѕ, and
I fеel likе I’ve got a web power-house. BlackberryWith the largest screen in this category, the 10-inch Blackberry which is really the most outstanding benefits range.
Elеctronic Rеfrigerant Leaκ DetectorѕElectroniс Refгigerant Leaκ Detectors aге thе quickest and easiest to usе of the Aіr
Conditioner. If your house is рlаced in industriаl arеas, yοu may hаve vacuum-sуstem supply line problem.
Also visit my homepage … http://artiklar24.se/Advantages-Air-Conditioner-How-To.htm