Ernie accuses me of optimism because of a piece in the Red Herring. In that piece, I argue that obsession about antitrust issues blinds us to other (also important) network and policy issues. And one in particular was how different DRM systems affect the network differently. Some, the argument goes, better support the end-to-end architecture that the network originally valued, and it would be easier to assure that token systems did so than copy protection systems. (Copyfight as usual puts it better than I.) Does that make me an optimist? Wouldn’t that be nice. But no: I am not arguing there’s less reason to worry about antitrust; nor arguing that DRM is a good thing; only arguing that we need constantly to think about how different technologies affect the policy of the net. Remember Mitch’s insight over a decade ago: Architecture is politics.
-
Archives
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- November 2002
- October 2002
- September 2002
- August 2002
-
Meta
The software guys are in a panic for no good reason. While it can be said and is currently thought that copyright covers the code and with a limited copyright length that we get to peek and laugh or rip them off, especially if we get to shorten the copyright to say 10 years, there isn’t a lot of software that was built 10 years ago still generating income.
The argument can be made that upgrades and the name staying the same such as Windows and Frontier are viable products, but in reality are derivitive works and therefore are new works.
Copyright if used at all as a software protection mechanism has a fatal defect as the government backed out on their part of the deal when they stopped requiring a deposit and a registration fee.
Intellectual property and copyright get confused as copyright requires an ‘expression’ whether ink on paper or bits on disk or pixels on a screen.
Digital Rights are exactly what we give them.
Gate erection on the web has been a dismal failure. DVD was cracked by a couple of young people who just wanted to watch movies on a Linux box. Napster and it’s successors demonstrate that sharing is more powerful than repression and exclusivity, whether by format, or playback.
Be on the lookout for the return of the Vinyl Record playable in factory sealed units.
I’ve written an analysis, it’s at
DRM and object control vs network control
There’s a good
summary of everything at copyright
Hmm, that didn’t work. Let’s try again:
My analysis: DRM and object control vs network control
“>http://sethf.com/infothought/blog/archives/000010.html#000010
Summary of everything, at copyfight
“>http://www.corante.com/copyfight/20020901.shtml#6393
Hello dear and my friend
Hello, very nice, thanks admin of this website. Thank.
بانک ایمیل
تور استانبول
ارسال ایمیل تبلیغاتی
تبلیغات در وایبر
متره لیزری
زیباترین آهنگ های بی کلام
مشاوره ازدواج
bye.w