Sony has launched its YouTube competitor – eyeVio. By default, uploads are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license. You can read about it here. We in the CC community will be celebrating about it around the world tonight. Yesterday was IP Day (really, no joke). Today is Sony Day!
-
Archives
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- November 2002
- October 2002
- September 2002
- August 2002
-
Meta
Wow. Sony uses a CC license for their service and all of a sudden they get their own day? If anything, the use of CC might erase one of their many recent screw ups. Rootkits, anyone? Proprietary storage media (UMD, MemoryStick, MiniDisc)? new DVD DRM that won’t even play in Sony DVD players? Blu-Ray?
I have no original opinion to contribute here. However, I will echo Valenti’s words on Creative Commons along with the former speaker in the video.
My interest in this debate comes down to the social isolating/alienating effects of an IP culture.
I recognize a lot of time, labor, and resources goes into original research and intellectual produce/output; however if every time I seek out somebody’s advice, a digital account is made of that, for an ongoing tally of the symbiosis of some relationship, then I think we’ve lost any sort of “casual social bonding”. Say good bye to Main Street, small town America, and hello to Wall Street, everywhere in America.
Fundamentally, the issue can be seen through the capitalist vs. communist debate. Sharing vs. Competing for Limited Resources.
Food for thought:
Knowledge is power.
I’m curious – does Sony get more rights to the work I submit than the general public does?
I was chatting with John Sullivan in #freeculture and he raised that issue. Obviously it’s not very “Free Culture”y to be granting some entities the right to use my work without even attribution. Neither of us could read the web site since we don’t know Japanese. Do you happen to know more on if this is the case?
As long as (1) Sony doesn’t require contributers to give them all the rights to the work while everyone else uses CC-BY, and as long as (2) Sony doesn’t require contributers to designate the sony website for attribution purposes, then Sony has no advantage to the CC-BY contributions over anyone else.
Which means, if anyone else wants to use the CC-BY content, they could just as easily host it on their website as Sony could, and both would be restricted by the attribution requirement.
If both 1 and 2 are true, then it sounds fair.
I don’t know if I would break out the champagne, though. It will likely be some good advertising for Creative Commons and their licenses, and probably get more people aware of the problems around infinite, all-powerful copyright, and the alternatives.
But it doesn’t sound like Sony is actually licensing any of their work under CC-BY, so, while it looks like it is a good thing, I don’t think I’ll be having a Sony Party just yet.
Now everybody seem to want a piece of the online video market share. I think visiting online video sites will be the next most common thing to do for a web surfer other than viewing blogs(in term of surfing habit).
This means big advertising revenues for the online video site which can dominate the market.
Most will agree that viewing a video is more entertaining than reading a blog. Just like comparing reading Spiderman comics to watching Spiderman 3. 🙂