A congressperson in the Aspen Ideas Festival audience was not happy.
-
Archives
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- November 2002
- October 2002
- September 2002
- August 2002
-
Meta
I liked your speech. Its very true. The influence that money on congress is largely ignored by media except when its grossly criminal.
Also, I’m reading Code 2.0, and its a fascinating read. Thanks.
On a separate note, you mentioned a successful diet, out of (self interested) curiosity, what was it.
I’d love to see the reaction to your speech.
The website says: “This is the quick clip of this session. To see the entire session, which is between 60 and 90 minutes, download below.”
Was there more to watch?
In response to Gen Kanai: We will be posting video of the full session as soon as it is encoded. Thank you for your interest.
Kind regards,
Jean Morra, The Aspen Institute
If you don’t have flash the video can be downloaded[1] as .flv and watched with (almost?) any modern player (e.g. vlc).
[1] http://www.aifestival.org/library/10min/01_063008.flv
Oh! An unhappy congressperson? Tragic.
Nicely done sir. You avoided the sarcastic political wit that we collectively chuckle at and forget. You avoided the wild-eyed activist rant that we all dismiss. You cagily swaddled a photon torpedo in words like “faith” and “trust” and sneaked it through the poor-baby’s force field. Good show..
And I especially liked that this brief talk had a bit of an “edge” on it. I had hoped that you’d offer more of this. Lean-and-mean; that’s the ticket.
Now if we can get Amy Goodman wielding an AK47 and spitting out four-letter words we just might get somewhere…..
Hey Lessig,
what happened to “Rah Rah Rah Obama, oh yeah he’s our man!”
your buddy Obama just voted to destroy the 4th Amendment. Looks like your political opinions suck ass.
If campaign finance the primary issue, one might want to support John McCain who is the candidate running with public money, who has his name on the major campaign finance reform bill and has not sold out the ethanol industry to win Iowa.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/23/us/politics/23ethanol.html
On the bright side if campaign finance reform is the major issue, and Obama can keep half his promises, things are bound to get better no matter who wins.
You can be darn sure that the only reason that McCain is taking public funding is because he doesn’t think he could raise more on his own (or that he’d rather help raise soft money). McCain is hardly principled about it. He flipped and flopped all through the primary purely according to expediency.
If he could raise money the way Obama has, he’d be rejecting public money along with Obama, because he knows the system is broken just as much as Obama knows it.
In the past McCain stooped to desperate measures and got caught in the Keating scandal. Perhaps that’s why he pushed for “reform”; because he was never a fundraising leader and it would be to his relative advantage to bring others down and level the playing field to his level.
I wonder if he would have been such a “maverick” if he had been on top.
Bottom line: McCain surely doesn’t come out smelling like a rose here. He’s down in the trenches like everybody else, driven by his practical circumstances as opposed to some fictitious “principle”…
I mean, gimme a break.
It’s too bad that a presidential candidate did not know a year ago that the campaign finance system was “broken” when he promised to use it. But now that he has smartened up, right take Obama’s word that he can fix it.
I don’t accept your argument that McCain is for campaign finance reform for selfish reasons (as Obama likely switched for selfish reasons) but even if McCain is just for campaign finance reform because it’s in his own interest – IT DOES NOT MATTER – you get campaign finance reform in any case.
@Steve Baba
Obama pledged to accept public financing iff McCain would reign in the 527s. McCain said there was nothing he could do about the 527s so the deal was off.
Obama, on the other hand, has asked all his big donors to not donate to 527s. Disavowing 527s is, IMHO, a much bigger commitment to ethical campaigning than accepting public financing because you took out a loan against it during your primary campaign.
I loved the speech. Very truthful.
Great speech. I wonder who will fight for the title of most unwanted? Congress person or used car salesperson. Anyway, nicely done.